| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Tue Oct 25 00:00:01 CEST 2016 | ||
| 2016-10-25 00:13 -!- drl(~drl@36.75.188.161) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 00:15 -!- drl(~drl@36.75.188.161) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 00:49 -!- sharkcz(~sharkcz@2a01:8c00:ffb3:160:250:43ff:fe3c:3b5d) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 00:49 -!- csotelo_at_work(~csotelo@190.42.17.25) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 01:13 <drl> Is there a PPA for Tryton 4.0? | ||
| 2016-10-25 01:43 <drl> Can Tryton download data from banks? | ||
| 2016-10-25 01:43 -!- marc0s_(~marcos@guineu.karta.im) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 01:44 -!- niki(~niki@0x3e2c8684.mobile.telia.dk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 01:44 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@249.135.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 01:44 -!- postal_blab(~quassel@2001:41d0:8:baae::bad:deed) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 01:44 -!- silwol[m](silwolmatr@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-hdpwzghazoaqskbr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 02:04 -!- apostatize(~visavis@unaffiliated/apostatize) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 03:48 -!- apostatize(~visavis@unaffiliated/apostatize) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 04:41 -!- robink_(~quassel@unaffilated/robink) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 05:35 -!- robink_(~quassel@unaffilated/robink) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 08:11 -!- dj_xatra(~dj_xatra@217.166.83.130) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 08:42 -!- leio_(~leio@gentoo/developer/leio) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 08:51 -!- mrichez(~smuxi@mail.saluc.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 09:11 -!- JanGB(~jan@ip92343817.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 09:14 -!- gytis(~gytis@v100.nfq.lt) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 09:35 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 09:58 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e672:1520:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:08 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@host-85-201-184-151.dynamic.voo.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:32 <JanGB> cedk: ping | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:35 <cedk> JanGB: pong | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:39 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e672:1520:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:50 <JanGB> cedk: is the datetime_field functionality on many2many implemented in an other way or is it missing? | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:51 <cedk> JanGB: I do not remeber but setting the context there will not work any way | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:52 <JanGB> cedk: ok | ||
| 2016-10-25 10:52 <cedk> JanGB: indeed it is managed by the parent_datetime_field on the Group | ||
| 2016-10-25 11:03 <JanGB> cedk: ok | ||
| 2016-10-25 11:43 -!- marc0s(~marcos@unaffiliated/marc0s) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 11:59 -!- Telesight(~anthony@4dae0c97.ftth.telfortglasvezel.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 12:24 <pokoli> cedk: do you have any remarks about https://bugs.tryton.org/issue5933 ? I will like to include it for 4.2 version | ||
| 2016-10-25 12:30 <cedk> pokoli: I do not like too much the keyword/default_keyword | ||
| 2016-10-25 12:31 <cedk> pokoli: why not make the call to add_name_suffix inside a test for each case | ||
| 2016-10-25 12:49 <mrichez> hi, how could a scenario have a different behaviour than doing the same things in the client ??? (my workflow create a new draft line and change state... in the scenario, state is changed but no draft line) | ||
| 2016-10-25 12:51 -!- mariomop(~quassel@181.110.159.18) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 12:59 <cedk> mrichez: proteus is not guarantee to be 100% identical to tryton but it tries to be | ||
| 2016-10-25 13:00 <cedk> mrichez: sometimes it is because the order of the inputs, sometimes it is because you rely on an unsupported behaviour from proteus | ||
| 2016-10-25 13:00 <cedk> mrichez: sometimes it is just about the user configuration | ||
| 2016-10-25 13:01 <cedk> mrichez: I mean the Tryton's user | ||
| 2016-10-25 13:25 <pokoli> cedk: thanks, i will review it latter :) | ||
| 2016-10-25 13:58 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 14:06 <notizblock> in the party menu there are two entries "Parties associated to Purchases" and "Parties associated to Sales". AFAIK those lists are populated using a wizard. Is it possible to get the same list of records using proteus? | ||
| 2016-10-25 14:08 <notizblock> for example by querying sale.sale with proteus I can get a list of parties associated with sales but it contains duplicates | ||
| 2016-10-25 14:09 <cedk> notizblock: run the wizard from proteus | ||
| 2016-10-25 14:18 <notizblock> cedk: Wizard('sale.open_customer').execute('open_') ? | ||
| 2016-10-25 14:18 <notizblock> cedk: gives xmlrpclib.Fault: <Fault 1: '(\'UserError\', (u"You try to read records that don\'t exist anymore.\\n(Document type: ir.session.wizard)", \'\'))'> | ||
| 2016-10-25 14:19 <cedk> notizblock: the session is expired | ||
| 2016-10-25 14:36 <notizblock> cedk: ah interesting, the records are available in wizard.actions | ||
| 2016-10-25 15:50 <perilla> cedk: about the test of cost_price for recompute_cost_price? what do you mean with "It should talk about changing the test because of Function field."... | ||
| 2016-10-25 15:57 -!- udono(~udono@tmo-098-204.customers.d1-online.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:10 <cedk> perilla: link? | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:13 <perilla> cedk: https://tryton-rietveld.appspot.com/27721003/#msg22 | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:14 <perilla> cedk: https://tryton-rietveld.appspot.com/27721003/#msg19 sorry | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:20 -!- niki(~niki@0x3e2c8684.mobile.telia.dk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:31 <cedk> perilla: I mean that the message should explain why it is changing not what it is changing | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:32 <perilla> cedk: ok | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:32 <cedk> perilla: for example, your current message seems to say that before there was no test | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:32 <cedk> perilla: but indeed it is because of a change in product that the test is no more valid | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:35 -!- Timitos(~kpreisler@host-88-217-184-172.customer.m-online.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:37 <cedk> perilla: also it does not need to be long indeed it is better short | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:37 <cedk> perilla: but it should correctly talk about the change | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:48 <perilla> cedk: I try to write the message :) | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:49 <perilla> cedk: today I try to do write a review to add testing scenario | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:50 <cedk> perilla: better | ||
| 2016-10-25 16:51 <cedk> perilla: OK, I'm waiting the scenario to push the fix | ||
| 2016-10-25 19:52 -!- nramirezuy(~nramirezu@r179-25-240-26.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 20:01 -!- nramirezuy(~nramirezu@r179-25-240-26.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 21:23 -!- JanGB(~jan@ipservice-092-216-122-042.092.216.pools.vodafone-ip.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 21:29 -!- csotelo_at_work(~csotelo@179.43.97.40) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 21:29 <csotelo_at_work> hello coders | ||
| 2016-10-25 21:29 <csotelo_at_work> I need a sugest on implement a server on amazon | ||
| 2016-10-25 21:30 <csotelo_at_work> what do you think is a good option on aws ec2 for development / implementation? thanks | ||
| 2016-10-25 21:32 <csotelo_at_work> m3.medium or t2.large? | ||
| 2016-10-25 22:04 -!- mariomop(~quassel@host196.190-30-103.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:14 <csotelo_at_work> ant suggest??? | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:18 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: I do not think it is possible to advise without knowing more about the project | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:19 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: also each time I checked amazon, I found it too expensive | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:19 <csotelo_at_work> any suggest? I need just something for a development team as a stage server | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:19 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: indeed any similar hosting solution is expensive for business application because they are design for website (no computation, just waiting request) | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:20 <csotelo_at_work> I see | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:20 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: for staging, just take the cheapest dedicated solution | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:21 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: and if your team work on the same lan, just take an old machine | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:21 <csotelo_at_work> do you think amaazon is ok? or do you have any suggest, please | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:21 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: never used amazon because for me, it is too expensive | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:21 <csotelo_at_work> hm,,,, sorry for the new question.. any hosting suggest? | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:22 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: at b2ck we use http://kimsufi.com/ | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:23 <csotelo_at_work> thanks alot | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:24 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: but as I said, often local machine is much cheaper | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:25 <cedk> for example, the testing server of the foundation, is a simple machine not hosted | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:25 <csotelo_at_work> for prod we use local, but the team works from home | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:26 <csotelo_at_work> I am staring on it, no yet an office | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:27 <cedk> csotelo_at_work: but you can run localy when developing | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:28 <csotelo_at_work> Yes, we work each one on its own home, on a city, and our first client is on a different city, I need a way on deploy to stage and client could test it, the prod server is located inside the business | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:29 <csotelo_at_work> bute yes, for development ia hev set a docker for work each one on it local machine | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:30 <csotelo_at_work> that is the reason | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:31 <csotelo_at_work> I also were thinkning on using the same client server, but I am no really sure about that | ||
| 2016-10-25 23:31 <csotelo_at_work> on using the same phisical machin for stage and prod |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!