| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Jun 29 00:00:01 CEST 2017 | ||
| 2017-06-29 00:53 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 01:00 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 02:20 -!- thaneor1(~ldlc6@179.26.50.152) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 02:28 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 04:32 -!- csotelo(~csotelo@2001:1388:49c6:5a64:7eac:5428:faa4:8ebe) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 07:35 -!- Timitos(~kpreisler@host-88-217-184-172.customer.m-online.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 07:36 -!- Timitos(~kpreisler@host-88-217-184-172.customer.m-online.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 08:21 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 08:44 -!- alexbodn(~alex@213.57.190.189) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 08:51 -!- mrichez(~smuxi@mail.saluc.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:38 -!- LordVan(~LordVan@gentoo/developer/LordVan) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:38 <LordVan> hi | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:53 -!- rpit(~rpit@aftr-37-24-144-89.unity-media.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:54 <pokoli> LordVan: hi | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:55 <LordVan> about what we talked about yesterday | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:56 <LordVan> would a module to accomodate my workflow (the basic parts of entering the order, generating my project sheets and -manually -invoicing later) be difficult / a lot of work or could it use some existing parts maybe? | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:58 <pokoli> LordVan: your project sheets may be tryton productions? | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:59 <LordVan> i am open to suggestions on what to look at / try ;) | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:59 <pokoli> LordVan: the invoices module can be totally reused | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:59 <LordVan> yeah the only change i need for sales is that i need the different wished/required-for-delivery-dates ;) | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:59 <LordVan> which should be fairly simple imho | ||
| 2017-06-29 09:59 <LordVan> (after looking at the module code of the one that doesn'T seem to work anymore) | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:00 <pokoli> LordVan: yeah, that's not so complex | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:00 <pokoli> LordVan: but for me the automation will be something like: | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:00 <pokoli> 1. Creating the production request based on customer needs | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:00 <LordVan> yes - that would be after creating the sale itself i guess | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:01 <pokoli> LordVan: when the sale is processed | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:01 <LordVan> well i'D need it to be linked ot that sale of course somehow so I'd have to at least create the sale itself first right? | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:01 <pokoli> LordVan: once you have this part, you should probably create a delivery after finishing a production | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:02 <pokoli> LordVan: if the sale workflow fits for you yes, other option is to create a custom model for entering the customer requests, with it's own workflow | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:03 <LordVan> Well tbh i was expecting that i would have to enter the data "twice" (or somehow copy) once from the actual order from the customer and then the details as production/project | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:03 <LordVan> do you think the project module would be useful too for that or just production? | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:04 <pokoli> LordVan: i think production it's what you are doing, isn't it? | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:04 <LordVan> yes | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:04 <LordVan> i am just a bit confused what the project module would be used for then | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:05 <pokoli> LordVan: for example if the production involves some tasks (for example defining what to produce) | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:06 <pokoli> LordVan: another usage is when selling services to a customer | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:22 <LordVan> ah | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:22 <LordVan> ok | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:22 <LordVan> btw | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:22 <LordVan> in the future could production also be used then to help calculate the price? - e.g. enter work hours , material costs, .. ? | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:24 <pokoli> LordVan: the nantic guys have a module that does something like this | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:25 <LordVan> ok well not something i need to start with anyway but good to know that there is something like that | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:25 <pokoli> LordVan: well this is a set of modules: https://bitbucket.org/nantic/profile/repositories?search=cost_plan | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:27 <LordVan> nice | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:27 <LordVan> well i know at least now that it is feasible | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:34 <pokoli> LordVan: yeah, I thing everything is feasible :) | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:35 <LordVan> let me see if i can figure out how we can use the production module (i didnT' see a step-by-step tutorial or anything somewhere - is there one?) | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:37 <pokoli> LordVan: not that I aware of | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:37 <LordVan> ok | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:38 <LordVan> it would be nice though to have some step-by-step guides for the most commonmodules ^^ | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:53 <cedk> LordVan: except that Tryton is a toolbox so there is no one way to use it | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:53 <LordVan> yes i meant just very basic of course ;) | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:53 <cedk> LordVan: we just try to have good defaults | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:53 <LordVan> so you know what can be done with defaults | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:54 <LordVan> but anyway .. i like tryton a lot better than dolibarr already haha | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:55 <cedk> LordVan: Tryton is mostly based always on the same concept/design | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:55 <LordVan> - that and you guys are great (the dolibarr IRC channels is dead and one hardly gets answers on their forum either) | ||
| 2017-06-29 10:59 <LordVan> should we ever meet in person we got to at least go for a couple of beers/coffee/whatever (my treat of course ;)) | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:01 <cedk> LordVan: we have an annual meeting, the next is is not yet announced | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:02 <LordVan> where is that usually? | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:05 <cedk> LordVan: it is always moving | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:05 <LordVan> ah ok | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:05 <cedk> LordVan: but next one should be in Belgium around the first weeks of December | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:05 <LordVan> hm belgium is not too bad - i'Ve been to fosdem before | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:07 <LordVan> cedk, is it an event geared more at devs or users ? | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:12 <cedk> LordVan: both, we try to have a day more for users and a day for devs | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:12 <LordVan> :) | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:23 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@host-85-201-184-151.dynamic.voo.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 11:54 <pokoli> cedk: December after the release? | ||
| 2017-06-29 12:21 <pokoli> cedk: BTW, do you have the patches for https://bugs.tryton.org/issue6609 ? | ||
| 2017-06-29 12:33 <cedk> pokoli: not yet | ||
| 2017-06-29 12:33 <cedk> pokoli: you can take it if you want | ||
| 2017-06-29 13:04 <pokoli> cedk: ok, i will take it | ||
| 2017-06-29 13:58 -!- Lordvan_(~LordVan@gentoo/developer/LordVan) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 14:07 -!- kstenger(~karla@r186-55-74-100.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 14:22 -!- csotelo(~csotelo@2001:1388:49c6:5a64:7eac:5428:faa4:8ebe) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 14:23 -!- thaneor(~ldlc6@r179-25-170-97.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 16:45 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 17:16 -!- mariomop(~quassel@host190.181-10-40.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 17:35 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 18:50 -!- Telesight(~anthony@4dae0c97.ftth.telfortglasvezel.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:01 -!- fmorato[m](fmoratomat@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-vxuippbqgfcfehwe) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:25 -!- pancutan(~Sergio@190.113.128.142) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:47 <csotelo> dear coders, I have updated my tryton 3.8 to the last one version and its module and an error start appearing https://pastebin.com/iyX9i2eT any suggest? | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:51 <cedk> csotelo: when you update, you must say from where | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:53 <cedk> csotelo: but it looks like you do not have any report defined for the invoice | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:54 <csotelo> cedk, I dont understand you. I just update from 3.8.9 to 3.8.12 | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:54 <csotelo> downloading files and that... no comand done after downloading latest 3.812 version | ||
| 2017-06-29 19:55 <csotelo> cedk, sorry for this really dumb question: what do you mean with """but it looks like you do not have any report defined for the invoice""" | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:00 <cedk> csotelo: the code search for a ir.action.report linked to the invoice model | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:00 <csotelo> ok | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:01 <csotelo> and it is on account_invoice/invoice.py | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:03 <csotelo> I have taken off an older module that was working with invoice, and it has an invoice report | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:03 <csotelo> but, it was taken off | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:03 <csotelo> probably it is still lokking for it??? | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:03 <csotelo> looking* | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:03 <cedk> csotelo: I guess this module deactivate the report and so now you have no report activated | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:04 <cedk> csotelo: you must reactivate the initial report | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:04 <cedk> csotelo: just search for it using "Active: False" | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:04 <csotelo> again.. the most dummy question: how? | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:05 <csotelo> cedk, more dummy, where? | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:05 <csotelo> I start feeling really dumb | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:09 <csotelo> cedk, ir_action_report table? | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:18 <csotelo> cedk, I was looking for it on Admin menu -> actions -> report, but no appear :S | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:18 <csotelo> this is really weird for me | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:18 <csotelo> I also have tried to re install account_invoice module | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:23 <csotelo> I have added directly and works!! | ||
| 2017-06-29 20:24 <csotelo> thanks a lot | ||
| 2017-06-29 21:49 -!- udono(~udono@135-057-210-188.ip-addr.inexio.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 22:01 -!- semarie_(~semarie@unaffiliated/semarie) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 22:35 -!- thaneor(~ldlc6@r179-25-170-97.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2017-06-29 22:58 <sisalp> hello, it seems the invoice address is used as destination address in sale order, even if a non-invoice address exists. Is it expected ? | ||
| 2017-06-29 23:03 <cedk> sisalp: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue6438 | ||
| 2017-06-29 23:11 <sisalp> cedk: I'm exactly in that case | ||
| 2017-06-29 23:12 <sisalp> cedk: do you mean my 4.4 database is ready and I only have to modify the sale.odt ? | ||
| 2017-06-29 23:13 <sisalp> cedk: or should I apply a patch too ? | ||
| 2017-06-29 23:16 <cedk> sisalp: next release will be ready for customization | ||
| 2017-06-29 23:16 <cedk> sisalp: but we keep default behaviour which is using the same address for sale than the invoice | ||
| 2017-06-29 23:26 <sisalp> cedk: thank you. I will adapt for the few cases I have and then move to next release. |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!