chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Aug 18 00:00:01 CEST 2016 | ||
2016-08-18 00:05 -!- robink_(~quassel@unaffilated/robink) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 00:07 -!- kstenger(~karla@r190-134-132-27.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 01:43 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 01:55 -!- JosDzGx(~Thunderbi@189.188.108.236) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 02:48 -!- JosDzGx(~Thunderbi@189.188.108.236) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 05:33 -!- niki_(~niki@0x3e2c872d.mobile.telia.dk) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 06:33 -!- pokoli(~pokoli@2001:41d0:1:9acb::1) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 08:07 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 08:07 -!- dj_xatra(~dj_xatra@217.166.83.130) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 08:14 -!- rpit(~rpit@aftr-37-24-144-125.unity-media.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 08:33 -!- scrapper(~scrapper@88.117.159.6) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 09:00 -!- notizblock(~notizbloc@nblock.org) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 09:00 <notizblock> is it possible to remove the webdav module during the upgrade from tryton 3.8 to 4.0 | ||
2016-08-18 09:01 <notizblock> it was never in use for 3.8 | ||
2016-08-18 09:01 -!- mrichez(~smuxi@mail.saluc.com) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 09:03 <cedk> notizblock: do you mean it was not installed on the database? | ||
2016-08-18 09:04 <notizblock> cedk: it was installed as it was a core module for 3.8 | ||
2016-08-18 09:04 <cedk> notizblock: on the database? | ||
2016-08-18 09:08 <notizblock> not in the database, just as python module | ||
2016-08-18 09:10 <cedk> notizblock: so you can but you have to delete it from ir_module table | ||
2016-08-18 09:14 <notizblock> cedk: great, thx | ||
2016-08-18 09:16 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@249.135.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 09:25 -!- meigallodixital_(~meigallod@188.72.113.47) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 09:28 -!- udono(~udono@ip-37-201-245-214.hsi13.unitymediagroup.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 09:37 -!- VaticanCameos(~VaticanCa@110.227.133.198) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 10:31 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@balisto.wifi.b2ck.com) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 11:10 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@249.135.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 11:47 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@249.135.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 12:44 -!- meigallodixital_(~meigallod@172.94.112.16) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 12:52 <notizblock> I noticed that the accounting flag may only be changed for standalone categories | ||
2016-08-18 12:52 <notizblock> on nested categories (be it parent or child) the flag can't be changed | ||
2016-08-18 12:52 <notizblock> what is the reason for this? | ||
2016-08-18 12:52 <notizblock> Product -> Categories | ||
2016-08-18 12:53 <cedk> notizblock: consistency | ||
2016-08-18 12:53 -!- mariomop(~quassel@181.94.12.45) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 12:54 <notizblock> cedk: is there a way to uncheck the flag in case for such compounds? | ||
2016-08-18 12:56 <cedk> notizblock: no you must remove all the tree | ||
2016-08-18 12:56 <notizblock> cedk: ok, thx for the info | ||
2016-08-18 12:57 <cedk> notizblock: this is the only way to ensure that all the tree has the same value | ||
2016-08-18 13:00 <notizblock> cedk: the easiest way will be to take tree by tree apart, remove the flag and rebuild the tree | ||
2016-08-18 13:05 <cedk> notizblock: do not understand | ||
2016-08-18 13:05 <notizblock> cedk: basically decouple the categories from the parent, update the flag and rebuild the tree | ||
2016-08-18 13:07 <silwol> cedk: it's because we don't want to use the categories from 3.8 for accounting, so they should no longer have the flag set after we migrated the products to the proper accounting category | ||
2016-08-18 13:16 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@91.116.135.249) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 13:17 <cedk> silwol: you can do it by SQL query as far as you keep the trees consistent | ||
2016-08-18 13:17 <silwol> cedk: we will use a small script using proteus | ||
2016-08-18 13:27 -!- zmijunkie(~Adium@i59F5E58E.versanet.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 13:28 <zmijunkie> join #roundcube | ||
2016-08-18 13:28 <zmijunkie> Sorry ;-) | ||
2016-08-18 13:33 <silwol> what's the proper way to process an order, when the supplier cancels the whole or only a part of the order, before even delivering the parts? | ||
2016-08-18 13:35 -!- VaticanCameos(~VaticanCa@110.227.133.198) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 13:46 <pokoli> silwol: On recent versions you can cancell the moves directly from the purchase form, otherwise you should create a shipment with the moves and cancel them | ||
2016-08-18 13:46 <pokoli> silwol: then cancel the invoices (if any) | ||
2016-08-18 13:46 <pokoli> silwol: and handle both exceptions without recreating anything | ||
2016-08-18 13:59 <silwol> pokoli: recent version >= 4? | ||
2016-08-18 14:03 <pokoli> silwol: it is http://hg.tryton.org/modules/purchase/rev/0f8c37c839a2/ which is currently only on development version ;) | ||
2016-08-18 14:05 <silwol> pokoli: it seems I did not understand that the exception window was a selection list. That helps a lot of course. | ||
2016-08-18 14:12 <pokoli> silwol: yes, you have to select which moves/invoices you want to recreate. If you did not select anything nothing is recreated | ||
2016-08-18 14:13 <pokoli> pokoli: and if everything is canceled and not recreated, the purchase is marked as done | ||
2016-08-18 14:13 <pokoli> silwol: because there is nothing else to be done | ||
2016-08-18 14:14 <silwol> pokoli: thank you very much, our user is very happy that there is a proper solution for this. | ||
2016-08-18 14:15 <pokoli> silwol: you're welcome | ||
2016-08-18 14:28 <cedk> I'm wondering how we could improve the wizard layout | ||
2016-08-18 14:29 <cedk> silwol: what was confusing? | ||
2016-08-18 14:30 <silwol> cedk: I did not realize that I could select anything in the window, and there was only one single entry in our case. | ||
2016-08-18 14:31 <cedk> should we use the term "Select" instead of "Choose"? | ||
2016-08-18 14:34 <silwol> cedk: we're using it in german, I don't know if I would have understood with the different wording. | ||
2016-08-18 14:35 <silwol> cedk: the other thing that is not obvious, is that something happens with the deselected items. | ||
2016-08-18 14:38 <cedk> maybe it should be something like: Select invoices to recreate and unselect invoices to ignore | ||
2016-08-18 14:38 <cedk> but indeed it is the help text of the field | ||
2016-08-18 14:38 <cedk> maybe the help should be added to the view to be always visible | ||
2016-08-18 15:18 -!- shrox(shrox@nat/iiit/x-bbuzqqnjyhiwmhft) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 15:23 -!- VaticanCameos(~VaticanCa@110.227.133.198) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 16:28 -!- kstenger(~karla@r190-134-51-252.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 16:30 -!- zmijunkie(~Adium@i59F5EE3E.versanet.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 18:02 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@189.188.108.236) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 18:25 -!- kstenger(~karla@r190-134-54-135.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 18:33 -!- JosDzGx(~Thunderbi@189.188.108.236) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 19:19 -!- scrapper(~scrapper@88.117.159.6) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 19:55 -!- Telesight(~anthony@4dae0c97.ftth.telfortglasvezel.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 20:01 -!- shrox(shrox@nat/iiit/x-xoylkoqippuyyuyb) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 22:21 -!- g5pw(~g5pw@mittelab/sudo/g5pw) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 22:29 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e674:5940:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton | ||
2016-08-18 23:19 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@189.188.108.236) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!