| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu May 12 00:00:02 CEST 2016 | ||
| 2016-05-12 00:20 -!- lukio(~lukio@host251.186-108-118.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 00:22 -!- lukio(~lukio@host251.186-108-118.telecom.net.ar) has left #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 00:47 -!- perilla(~perilla@corp-190-57-169-210-cue.puntonet.ec) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 01:44 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@fixed-188-72-187-188-72-36.iusacell.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 02:22 -!- JosDzGx(~Thunderbi@fixed-188-72-187-188-72-36.iusacell.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 03:58 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 04:22 -!- smarro(~sebastian@190.14.157.18) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 04:40 -!- smarro(~sebastian@190.14.157.18) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 05:08 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 07:29 -!- ccaz(~ccr@ax313-1-82-66-159-99.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 07:40 -!- frispete(~frispete@p54A90A1D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 07:58 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e672:9420:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 08:12 -!- udono(~udono@ip-178-202-239-138.hsi09.unitymediagroup.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 08:16 -!- tbruyere(~smuxi@mail.saluc.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 08:18 -!- Timitos(~kpreisler@host-88-217-184-172.customer.m-online.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 08:32 -!- dj_xatra(~dj_xatra@217.166.83.130) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 08:49 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 08:52 -!- mrichez(~smuxi@mail.saluc.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:07 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@249.135.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:31 <cedk> pokoli: please don't forget to put the review id in commit message | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:32 <pokoli> cedk: you are right sorry :( | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:33 <pokoli> cedk: I see you fixed the drone sintax, but currently is failing in drone | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:34 <pokoli> cedk: it's strange as it was working correctly on my machine | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:36 <cedk> pokoli: I think the postinstall is not run | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:39 <pokoli> cedk: your right bower is not executed | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:46 <cedk> pokoli: fixed | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:46 <cedk> pokoli: I have also setup local-npm | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:46 <cedk> still missing is same tool but for bower | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:48 <pokoli> cedk: Great, sorry for the mes but it was dificult to me to test the .drone.yml fiel as it's ignored on drone.io | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:48 <pokoli> ACTION is googling for a local-bower :) | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:51 <cedk> pokoli: private-bower seems to be | ||
| 2016-05-12 09:55 <pokoli> cedk: yes it seems | ||
| 2016-05-12 10:11 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@249.135.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 10:11 -!- meanmicio(~lfm@fsf/member/meanmicio) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 10:11 -!- meanmicio(~lfm@fsf/member/meanmicio) has left #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 10:30 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@host-85-201-184-151.dynamic.voo.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 11:56 -!- Pilou(~Pilou@181.204.19.93.rev.sfr.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 11:56 -!- Pilou(~Pilou@pdpc/supporter/active/pilou) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 12:17 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 16:39 -!- bvillasanti(~bvillasan@190.105.80.94) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 16:59 <sisalp> hello, | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:00 <sisalp> about https://bugs.tryton.org/issue5548, couldn't we consider an indicator [0..99,many] and stop counting when it won't be displayed on a single page ? | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:02 <cedk> sisalp: do you know how to stop counting in SQL? | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:05 <sisalp> cedk: I don't even know how to start to count in SQL :-( | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:11 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e672:9420:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:11 <pokoli> sisalp: don't understand why it will be usefull to not show the correct number | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:12 <cedk> pokoli: in the patch, I already convert > 100 into 99+, to limit the size | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:13 <pokoli> cedk: So this info should not be very usefull on big databases | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:14 <pokoli> cedk: for example we had a customer how normally has 2000+ posted invoices to be paid | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:14 <pokoli> s/how/who | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:15 <sisalp> pokoli: I don't think he wants to manage hiss frontlog with the thumbnails | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:16 <cedk> pokoli: what will bring to have a more precise number? | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:16 <sisalp> cedk: yes this was my idea. | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:18 <cedk> sisalp: but this is not done SQL level so we must avoid to count large dataset | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:20 <pokoli> cedk: in terms of preccission it will be correct, but in terms of knowing the work to be done (in order to lower the number to zero) it will be the same to show 99+, than 456 | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:20 <cedk> pokoli: don't understand | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:21 -!- ccaz(~ccr@ax313-1-82-66-159-99.fbx.proxad.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:21 <pokoli> cedk: I'm used to my email client which always show the correct number, and having for example 259 (which is the current number of emails in my inbox) its more precise than 99+ | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:22 <pokoli> cedk: A more precisse number is better for comparision. For example to compare the pending numbers of invoices in the start of the day and in the end of the day | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:23 <pokoli> cedk: it's impossible to compare 99+ with a lower number | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:23 <cedk> pokoli: you can have precise number by selecting the tab | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:24 <cedk> pokoli: I think it will be bad to have too large tabs because of big number | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:24 <pokoli> ACTION haven't tested the clients patches (yet) | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:25 <cedk> also people can not compare easily 1818272 and 1827263 | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:25 <cedk> or we need to have formatting and so take even more place etc. | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:27 <pokoli> cedk: I see your point, but for me 99 is too little number | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:27 <Timitos> i agree that 99+ is a good idea. for me it would be enough to have the precise numbers by selecting the tab | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:27 <pokoli> cedk: for example, postend invoices is "Contabilizada" which is 13 chars lengths, So one or two more digits won't hurt | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:28 <pokoli> "Contabilizada" in spanish | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:28 <pokoli> Timitos: you mean the precise numbers in the tab? AFAIU the precessies numbers is shown in the record count as shown currently | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:28 <cedk> pokoli: I think count on this precise tab is not really useful | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:29 <Timitos> pokoli: i mean that it is enough to have the precise numbers in the record count | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:29 <cedk> pokoli: it is not the important information, the important information is the due amount and you get it in the party balance | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:30 <cedk> the idea is that user see if there is something to do before clicking | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:30 <pokoli> cedk: so we agree that the number of posted invoices is not relevant to the user? | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:30 <cedk> and if he can manage to do it, so 99+ is something you can not manage humanly in a day | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:31 <cedk> pokoli: not really, the important are draft and validated | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:31 <cedk> it is not important because user can do nothing to reduce it | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:32 <pokoli> cedk: understood, so we can agree on the 99+, but the count option has to be activated only with care | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:33 <pokoli> cedk: only on models that "have pending actions" | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:33 <cedk> pokoli: yes but I don't think "Posted" would have create performence issues | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:33 <cedk> pokoli: it is just that it is less useful | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:34 <pokoli> cedk: i don't think we will have a performance issue for counting the number of records on a big table (postgresql is fast in this operation), but i think the problem is the GUI | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:36 <cedk> pokoli: postgresq need to read all tuple to count, so it has performence consideration | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:40 <cedk> FYI, I think Posted should have any way the counter because the number 0 is an indication of something wrong | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:40 <pokoli> cedk: but limiting to 99+, will have the same performance issue. So for me the warning in the doc is enought | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:41 <pokoli> cedk: so for a warning, i will prefffer an icon, instead of zero | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:42 <pokoli> Some maybe adding a pyson expression to return the icon should be a good idea | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:42 <pokoli> ACTION is not sure about only the icon, or the icon and the text. Just was an idea | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:43 <cedk> pokoli: yes the 99+ limit is just to limit the display | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:44 <cedk> pokoli: I don't think warning should be just visual thing somewhere | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:44 <cedk> pokoli: if we need warning it should be done with notification which is for now email | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:48 <pokoli> cedk: when i say warning, i mean "the number 0 is an indication of something wrong" | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:57 <cedk> pokoli: by 0, I mean too low | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:58 <cedk> I don't think we must complexify with color/icon etc. | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:58 <pokoli> cedk: yes, so thats why I thought about the button, so the user does not need too know which is the threshold about too low or to much | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:58 <cedk> we must try to keep the quantity of information not too much | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:59 <pokoli> cedk: agree | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:59 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 17:59 <cedk> pokoli: I think especially the threshold is about feeling so there is no magical number | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:03 <pokoli> cedk: i also think so. What I fear is that the threshould if over 99+, so then information is not relevant | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:03 <pokoli> s/if over/is over/ | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:03 <cedk> pokoli: in this case, it will become later | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:05 <cedk> pokoli: maybe we could add a tooltip with the right number | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:06 <pokoli> cedk: sounds like a good idea | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:07 <pokoli> cedk: I was thinking about make the threshold configurable like the search results, but I'm not sure about it | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:08 <pokoli> ACTION bbl | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:09 <cedk> pokoli: I always try to avoid adding configuration | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:10 <cedk> adding configuration is a failure | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:22 -!- ccaz(~ccr@125-117-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 18:22 -!- ccaz(~ccr@125-117-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr) has left #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 19:13 -!- Telesight(~anthony@4dae0c97.ftth.telfortglasvezel.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 19:19 -!- bvillasanti(~bvillasan@190.105.80.94) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 19:42 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.47.251.97) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 21:01 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@201.157.45.34) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 21:16 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 22:04 -!- shrox(~shrox@103.255.36.86) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 22:26 -!- mariomop(~quassel@host76.190-136-213.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 22:46 -!- shrox(~shrox@103.255.36.86) has left #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 22:51 -!- shrox(~shrox@103.255.36.86) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 22:56 -!- leio(~leio@gentoo/developer/leio) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 22:57 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@201.157.45.34) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-05-12 23:56 -!- perilla(~perilla@corp-190-57-169-210-cue.puntonet.ec) has left #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!