| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Fri Apr 1 00:00:01 CEST 2016 | ||
| 2016-04-01 00:21 -!- aroncero_(~aroncero@86.63.19.153) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 01:22 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 02:59 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 03:26 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 04:17 -!- bvillasanti(~bvillasan@181.16.50.158) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 05:16 -!- kstenger1(~karla@r167-56-240-203.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 06:04 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 06:39 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 07:32 -!- ccaz(~ccr@ax313-1-82-66-159-99.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 07:40 -!- frispete(~frispete@p54A91DC6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 08:10 -!- dj_xatra(~dj_xatra@217.166.83.130) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 08:14 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e672:9420:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 08:16 -!- JosDzGx(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 09:24 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 09:27 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@host-85-201-184-151.dynamic.voo.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 10:10 -!- meigallodixital(~meigallod@249.135.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 10:59 -!- Telesight(~anthony@4dae0c97.ftth.telfortglasvezel.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:19 -!- csotelo(~csotelo@190.235.149.53) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:41 <aroncero> Hi, I want to use production module to disassembly a product instead of an assembly | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:47 <cedk> aroncero: the production module has no distinction between assembly or disassembly | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:49 <aroncero> cedk: I know, but when you make a production order | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:50 <aroncero> cedk: you must select a product | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:50 <aroncero> cedk: and this product must be an output no an input | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:51 <aroncero> cedk: example: I receive a table | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:51 <aroncero> cedk: and it is been 4 kg of wood | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:52 <aroncero> cedk: and 1 kg of steel | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:53 <aroncero> cedk: I must can select product table in production, but now product is mandatory to be an output | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:54 <aroncero> cedk: I think if we put a check in BOM that mark as "reverse" | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:54 <aroncero> cedk: and the list of selectable product in production will be inputs instead of outputs | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:56 <aroncero> cedk: now i make a dirty way creating the product "out table" in output without a significant qty | ||
| 2016-04-01 11:58 <aroncero> cedk: but it is a botched job | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:03 <cedk> aroncero: you just have to not put a product on the production | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:06 <cedk> but I agree that it will be great to be able to use bom for such case | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:08 <aroncero> I will think about it and I will create a entry in discuss | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:09 <aroncero> cedk: but if I dont select a product, Can I select a BOM? | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:11 <cedk> aroncero: for now, no because to explode the bom we need a quantity as reference | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:11 <cedk> aroncero: but I think this could be improved | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:30 <aroncero> cedk: So, I must use "a trick" to make a disassembly | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:31 <cedk> aroncero: no, you can right now create a production order | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:31 <cedk> aroncero: it is just that you can not use BOM but it is often the case when you disassemble you don't really now what you will get | ||
| 2016-04-01 12:42 -!- mariomop(~quassel@host167.190-137-85.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 13:12 <aroncero> cedk: create inputs and outputs manually in each production order? | ||
| 2016-04-01 13:19 <cedk> aroncero: yes | ||
| 2016-04-01 13:34 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 14:00 <aroncero> cedk: It does not seem very productive for a recycling plant (WEEE) | ||
| 2016-04-01 14:01 <aroncero> cedk: I will work in a paper to discuss it | ||
| 2016-04-01 14:44 -!- smarro(~sebastian@181.16.7.104) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 14:55 -!- bvillasanti(~bvillasan@181.16.50.158) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 14:56 -!- sisalp(~sisalpuse@boxoo.sisalp.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 15:40 -!- shrox(shrox@nat/iiit/x-cxcxrdgvgzampubj) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 15:50 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 15:56 -!- shrox(shrox@nat/iiit/x-porogcgshlwekhya) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:21 -!- andrespoliti(~andrespol@250-183-89-200.fibertel.com.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:21 <andrespoliti> is there a way of generating a report for a readonly model with property fields? I have | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:22 <andrespoliti> a model that displays records from a view and depending on what you select on a combo, shows additional information in property fields | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:23 <andrespoliti> but all the property fields are blank in the report because they cannot be saved | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:24 <cedk> andrespoliti: by property do you mean Function? | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:24 <andrespoliti> fields.Property | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:25 <cedk> andrespoliti: Property are stored but you should avoid to use them, there are going to be removed | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:26 <andrespoliti> but if i use fields.Function i would have to define getters, but these fields should not have them | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:27 <cedk> andrespoliti: I don't understand your design | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:28 <andrespoliti> these fields depend on the value of the combo field, so initially they are empty | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:30 <cedk> andrespoliti: for me, it is clearly a Function field and not at all a Property | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:32 <andrespoliti> the property fields are set with the combo's on_change | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:32 <andrespoliti> and have no getters | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:32 <cedk> andrespoliti: this is bad design | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:32 <andrespoliti> if i make them function, i should define a lot of empty getters | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:32 <cedk> andrespoliti: Property fields are stored in a separate table, but it is *stored* fields | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:33 <cedk> andrespoliti: what you describe is clearly a Function: something computed out of other values | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:34 <andrespoliti> ok, i will review the design | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:34 <andrespoliti> thank you! | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:35 <cedk> andrespoliti: you can use an on_change_with as getter of the Function field | ||
| 2016-04-01 16:36 <andrespoliti> okey, i will try that | ||
| 2016-04-01 17:59 -!- zdenek(~quassel@d172-219-180-73.abhsia.telus.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 19:21 -!- shrox(~shrox@183.82.106.99) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 19:43 -!- shrox(shrox@nat/iiit/x-pfspazxnhgcuqhig) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 20:03 -!- bvillasanti(~bvillasan@181.16.50.158) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 21:04 -!- hectorh30(~hectorh30@190.149.223.38) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 21:13 -!- zdenek(~quassel@d172-219-180-73.abhsia.telus.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 22:31 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2016-04-01 22:41 -!- JosDzG(~Thunderbi@187.188.72.35) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!