| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Tue Mar 19 00:00:02 CET 2013 | ||
| 2013-03-19 06:31 -!- sharoonthomas(~sharoonth@122.177.56.223) has left #tryton | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:16 <efx> Hi, I don't know if this is the best strategy to go but.. I have a tryton model (the patient model from the GNUHEALTH project) that I want to make accessible to both patient and practitioner however I want them to work on two distinct copies of the same entry ( this is crucial to control the changes made by both the patient and the practitioner). | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:16 <efx> Do you think it is better to create a full copy of the gnuhealth.patient model or to do everything in the same model ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:23 <cedk> efx: don't understand, what do you mean by copy? | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:26 <efx> cedk: I mean a copy of the gnuhealth.patient model something like gnuhelath.patient2 | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:38 <efx> cedk: I don't know maybe its simpler and better to add an extra field to the current model to link 2 entries but I was thinking that it would be easier with an other model, however I don't know if a copy can be done without having to copy the whole model class.. | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:40 <cedk> efx: please expose your *real* problem | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:41 <efx> 1/ patient should have access to their medical data, | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:42 <efx> 2/ practitian should have access to the medical data of their patient | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:43 <efx> 3/ the modification made by the patient on its medical data should not directly modify what the practician is seeing (in other word the practitian can accept or reject the modification) | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:43 <cedk> efx: I don't understand, you mean that patient will have Tryton installed to update it ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:44 <efx> I created a web interface to tryton so he will use that | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:44 -!- mrechte1(~mrechte@landtrekker.com) has left #tryton | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:45 <cedk> efx: so you don't care about access control, just do it in you web interface | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:46 <efx> cedk: what do you mean by "do it" in your web interface ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:49 <efx> I mean I need a somehow to have a backup of the data | ||
| 2013-03-19 10:49 <efx> that's why I was thinking of using an other model | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:27 <sharoonthomas> cedk: would try_assign at the stock.shipment.out level be the right place to hack if we had to implement multi-warehouse shipping ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:29 <cedk> sharoonthomas: i don't think so | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:29 <cedk> sharoonthomas: because draft move are already part of the supply chain | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:29 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I guess if you have many warehouse there is a strategy to fill them | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:29 <sharoonthomas> cedk: ok, so what would be your recommendation ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:30 <sharoonthomas> cedk: like prefer a primary warehouse for products ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:30 <cedk> sharoonthomas: for example | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:38 <sharoonthomas> cedk: did i miss something | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:44 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I think you must first define the warehouse management strategy | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:44 <sharoonthomas> cedk: ok | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:44 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I think generally, company sale from the closest one | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:44 <sharoonthomas> cedk: yes | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:47 <cedk> sharoonthomas: so warehouse is choosen at the sale | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:48 <sharoonthomas> cedk: but how to fulfill if the product is available on a different warehouse ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:48 <cedk> sharoonthomas: there is order point between warehouse | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:49 <sharoonthomas> cedk: but there are no internal transfers ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:50 <cedk> sharoonthomas: don't understand | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:51 <sharoonthomas> cedk: to simplify, at the moment we have warehouse at the order level, but is it possible to move them to order line level ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:51 <sharoonthomas> cedk: this would allow fulfilling the same order from multiple warehouses | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:51 <sharoonthomas> cedk: and filling the warehouse at the line could be based on the warehouse management strategy ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:52 <cedk> sharoonthomas: what is the point ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:54 <sharoonthomas> cedk: lets say that there are two warehouses - A & B | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:54 <sharoonthomas> cedk: A has some products and B has others | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:55 <sharoonthomas> cedk: It should be possible to take a single order with products available in both warehouses | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:55 <sharoonthomas> cedk: and create shipments from A & B with the corresponding products | ||
| 2013-03-19 12:56 <cedk> sharoonthomas: i don't see a simple solution | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:02 <sharoonthomas> cedk: agree with that. I looked at SAP B1 implementation and they seem to take warehouse at the line level | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:04 <cedk> sharoonthomas: we could make room in base module to easy such customization | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:04 <cedk> sharoonthomas: and indeed it is already there | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:04 <cedk> sharoonthomas: see there is a function field on saleline to get the warehouse | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:04 <sharoonthomas> ACTION looking at code | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:05 <cedk> sharoonthomas: so you could already customize it to return an other warehouse | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:05 <cedk> sharoonthomas: and move line are grouped by warehouse | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:06 <sharoonthomas> cedk: could you share a link | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:06 <sharoonthomas> cedk: to the source | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:07 <sharoonthomas> cedk: i see the method _group_shipment_key | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:08 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I don't really have link or it is the all file | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:08 <cedk> sharoonthomas: on SaleLine there is a warehouse function field | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:08 <sharoonthomas> cedk: looks like its just a matter of changing how warehouse in line is handled | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:09 <sharoonthomas> cedk: exactly, what do you think of using the warehouse on sale by default (current behavior) and an override_warehouse (m2o stock.location) which overrides for specific lines ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:13 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I really think it is custom how you choose your warehouse | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:49 <sisalp> hello, I cannot find info on tryton.org about third party modules. Looking for contract_management and periodic invoicing/renewal | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:54 <sharoonthomas> cedk: your API designs and vision is amazing. | ||
| 2013-03-19 13:55 <cedk> sisalp: look at PyPI if they have been released | ||
| 2013-03-19 14:04 <sisalp> cedk: I should have thought about it by my self ! There are plenty of good modules on pypi ;-) | ||
| 2013-03-19 14:09 <cedk> sisalp: the link is on download page of tryton.org: http://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=browse&show=all&c=551 | ||
| 2013-03-19 14:19 <sisalp> I found a subcription module from zikzikmedia, I remember of another module from Netherlands. Nobody knows where it was ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 14:45 <sisalp> zikzikmedia module is certainly the one to consider Thank you. | ||
| 2013-03-19 14:47 <corro> sisalp: just out of curiosity: what is this subscription module for? | ||
| 2013-03-19 14:58 <sisalp> I'm evaluating it for me (hosting services) and for a prospect who needs to manage a business center (shared offices) | ||
| 2013-03-19 15:05 <sharoonthomas> cedk: are we applying to be on GSoC this year ? | ||
| 2013-03-19 15:07 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I posted on the mailing list that I will not take the job | ||
| 2013-03-19 15:07 <sharoonthomas> cedk: missed the email, going back to the emails | ||
| 2013-03-19 21:41 <nacho586> hay alguien? | ||
| 2013-03-19 22:58 <plantian> Does trytond use multiple processes or just multiple threads? | ||
| 2013-03-19 23:01 <juanfe> plantian, I don't know, but to use multiple process it must use parallel python no? | ||
| 2013-03-19 23:02 <juanfe> As I figure it use: import threading | ||
| 2013-03-19 23:08 <plantian> juanfe: Yeah I think it must just use threading. |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!