| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Sun Feb 26 00:00:01 CET 2012 | ||
| 2012-02-26 02:14 -!- verneda1(~verneda@216.194.219.87.dynamic.jazztel.es) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-02-26 02:16 -!- verneda1(~verneda@216.194.219.87.dynamic.jazztel.es) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-02-26 10:33 -!- sisalp(~dominique@annecy.sisalp.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-02-26 16:52 <xrg_> cedk: IMHO the problem with wkfs is exactly the opposite: they are under-used. | ||
| 2012-02-26 16:54 <cedk> xrg_: I don't think so, there are too restrictive | ||
| 2012-02-26 16:56 <cedk> xrg_: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tryton-dev/AVYVd_hniCI/discussion | ||
| 2012-02-26 16:56 <xrg_> lemme see. | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:00 <xrg_> Yes, I had read that discussion before thinking mine. Your points are true, but there is more solutions than just removing wkfs. | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:00 <xrg_> Remember, in F3 the strategy is to remain compatible, not remove any core features (even ugly ones) | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:02 <cedk> xrg_: I'm speaking about Tryton | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:02 <xrg_> I know, I'm just sharing my thoughts on the same subject, parallel design. | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:04 <cedk> xrg_: we can not share if you don't have the same targets | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:04 <cedk> xrg_: for us, OE compatbility is gone since day 1 | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:06 <xrg_> That's the reason I'm not just a part of Tryton now. ;) But still, technical discussions are common to us, I believe. | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:08 <xrg_> You take the red pill, I take the blue pill | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:09 <cedk> xrg_: ok but so I don't see why you want to keep workflow except for compatibility | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:10 <xrg_> cedk: my reason is that I want the processes to be configurable in the db, not need python code. | ||
| 2012-02-26 17:11 <cedk> xrg_: I think it is a dream to think lambda user will configure workflow |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!