chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Sat Feb 18 00:00:01 CET 2012 | ||
2012-02-18 15:19 <sisalp> hello, did some of you use lo,g sale orders, invoices, picking lists ? I mean 250 order lines ? | ||
2012-02-18 15:20 <sisalp> how is tryton performance impacted in this case ? | ||
2012-02-18 15:21 <sisalp> lo,g/long | ||
2012-02-18 15:28 <cedk> sisalp: I don't think it will be very good | ||
2012-02-18 15:29 <cedk> sisalp: I think if you have such case, it will be better to remove the one2many lines of sale and use a relate form | ||
2012-02-18 15:29 <sisalp> openerp collapses. The dashboard blocks the web interface because of timeout. | ||
2012-02-18 15:30 <sisalp> what would be the process with relate form ? | ||
2012-02-18 15:30 <cedk> sisalp: I don't think Tryton will collapse but it will be slow to work on the sale | ||
2012-02-18 15:31 <cedk> sisalp: create the sale order without any lines -> click on relate button -> it opens a new tab for sale lines linked to the sale order -> encode the lines -> when done, go back to sale order and validate it | ||
2012-02-18 15:32 <cedk> sisalp: inside a tab, we can manage thousands of lines in Tryton | ||
2012-02-18 15:33 <cedk> sisalp: hope it will be enough :-) | ||
2012-02-18 15:34 <sisalp> will it need to build a new format for documents ? | ||
2012-02-18 15:36 <cedk> sisalp: what do you name documents? | ||
2012-02-18 15:37 <sisalp> proposal to send to the customer, order, piking lists and invoices | ||
2012-02-18 15:38 <cedk> sisalp: they will be long but I don't see how they can not be | ||
2012-02-18 15:38 <cedk> sisalp: by the way, what kind of business have such sale order? | ||
2012-02-18 15:39 <sisalp> my question was about the relate form. Will documents auto adapt to this alternative way ? | ||
2012-02-18 15:39 <sisalp> probably a stupid question | ||
2012-02-18 15:41 <cedk> sisalp: yes, because it will not change the internal Model of the object | ||
2012-02-18 15:42 <cedk> sisalp: it is just a workarround for the client | ||
2012-02-18 15:42 <cedk> sisalp: indeed the issue will be that on current sale order, when you change a line, there is a call to the server with all the lines values to update the total | ||
2012-02-18 15:45 <sisalp> the first point this user was ranting about is the sequence number of the lines. Tryton is far better with drag and drop lines to auto-adapt sequences :-) | ||
2012-02-18 15:47 <sisalp> he did not compalain about the slowness of the order itself, but the web interface just becomes destabilized by time outs. | ||
2012-02-18 15:47 <cedk> sisalp: strange because it is a feature that was copy/paste by OE | ||
2012-02-18 15:48 <sisalp> hae also has a problem with serial numbers because it requires several syeps at picking and with so many lines, it is quite impossible | ||
2012-02-18 15:49 <sisalp> tthe oe dashboard is showed first in web interface and it takes more than two minutes to be set, so it never appears afer 2mn hold | ||
2012-02-18 15:50 <sisalp> syeps/steps | ||
2012-02-18 15:50 <sisalp> you mean drag and drop ? | ||
2012-02-18 15:51 <cedk> sisalp: yes | ||
2012-02-18 15:52 <cedk> also this https://bugs.tryton.org/issue1382 could become an issue | ||
2012-02-18 15:56 <sisalp> I checked frag and drop also works on openerp-web. I didn't know this. The user does know either ;-) | ||
2012-02-18 15:59 <gltripp> hello | ||
2012-02-18 16:01 <gltripp> ouh - my tryton client is dead when im trying finish an invoice | ||
2012-02-18 16:02 <gltripp> oO | ||
2012-02-18 16:03 <sisalp> gltripp: what's there in the logs ? | ||
2012-02-18 16:05 <gltripp> thats the ting: there is no communication to the server | ||
2012-02-18 16:05 <gltripp> is seems like the client is in a dead-lock | ||
2012-02-18 16:07 <gltripp> +h | ||
2012-02-18 16:07 <gltripp> the client just.. hangs | ||
2012-02-18 16:08 <cedk> gltripp: which version? | ||
2012-02-18 16:09 <gltripp> 2.2.1 | ||
2012-02-18 16:09 <cedk> gltripp: can you print the draft invoice report? | ||
2012-02-18 16:09 <gltripp> last output of strace is "recvfrom(12, | ||
2012-02-18 16:09 <gltripp> thats all | ||
2012-02-18 16:10 <gltripp> server is idle | ||
2012-02-18 16:13 <cedk> gltripp: what about the report? | ||
2012-02-18 16:13 <gltripp> which report ? | ||
2012-02-18 16:13 <cedk> gltripp: the invoice report | ||
2012-02-18 16:14 <cedk> gltripp: before opening the invoice, you can retreive the report | ||
2012-02-18 16:15 <gltripp> hm | ||
2012-02-18 16:15 <gltripp> ouh | ||
2012-02-18 16:15 <gltripp> it worked | ||
2012-02-18 16:15 <gltripp> strange | ||
2012-02-18 16:15 <gltripp> last 15 minutes - it hang on this | ||
2012-02-18 16:15 <gltripp> o.O | ||
2012-02-18 16:16 <cedk> gltripp: network issue? | ||
2012-02-18 16:17 <gltripp> don't think so - my network runs fast enough. even on ipv6 | ||
2012-02-18 16:39 <gltripp> hm | ||
2012-02-18 16:39 <gltripp> i can specify the argument ${to} in the mail actions | ||
2012-02-18 16:40 <gltripp> but it seams not to work. the attachment arguments works instead | ||
2012-02-18 16:41 <cedk> gltripp: how did you define it in the action? | ||
2012-02-18 16:43 <gltripp> thunderbird -compose "to='${to}',subject='Rechnung',attachment='${attachment}'" | ||
2012-02-18 16:43 <gltripp> subject and attachment works | ||
2012-02-18 16:45 <cedk> gltripp: ok, but you must define for each report what is the field of the record that contains the to | ||
2012-02-18 16:45 <gltripp> where ? | ||
2012-02-18 16:48 <cedk> gltripp: on the report action | ||
2012-02-18 16:50 <gltripp> i'm confused | ||
2012-02-18 16:50 <gltripp> i only understand half of the options in the settings... | ||
2012-02-18 16:56 <gltripp> where can i find this setting ? | ||
2012-02-18 17:01 <cedk> gltripp: in Administartion>User Interface>Actions>Reports | ||
2012-02-18 17:01 <gltripp> okay | ||
2012-02-18 17:01 <gltripp> there is an "E-Mail" field | ||
2012-02-18 17:01 <gltripp> but... | ||
2012-02-18 17:02 <gltripp> no tooltip, drop down or any other clue | ||
2012-02-18 17:05 <cedk> gltripp: there is a tooltop | ||
2012-02-18 17:07 <gltripp> not on this field, for me | ||
2012-02-18 17:08 <cedk> gltripp: yeps, the help was added after 2.2 release | ||
2012-02-18 17:09 <gltripp> :-D | ||
2012-02-18 17:09 <gltripp> okay, but i'm not upgrading yet :-) | ||
2012-02-18 17:09 <gltripp> what says the tooltip ? | ||
2012-02-18 17:11 <cedk> gltripp: http://hg.tryton.org/trytond/file/tip/trytond/ir/action.py#l343 | ||
2012-02-18 17:12 <gltripp> ouhm | ||
2012-02-18 17:13 <gltripp> i cant define a models field? | ||
2012-02-18 17:13 <gltripp> when somebody wants to send an invoice to a customer, it should be the customers mail, right? | ||
2012-02-18 17:14 <cedk> gltripp: you can use a PYSON expression | ||
2012-02-18 17:14 <gltripp> oO | ||
2012-02-18 17:14 <gltripp> oh no.. | ||
2012-02-18 17:15 <gltripp> defining what should be the "to" becomes a mess.. | ||
2012-02-18 18:07 <cedk> gltripp: I don't see how it could be different |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!