| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Wed Jan 25 00:00:01 CET 2012 | ||
| 2012-01-25 11:30 <Ivan_37> SUP everyone! | ||
| 2012-01-25 11:34 -!- Ivan_37(Ezarestha@182.5.12.5) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:07 <grasbauer> hi all | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:08 <cedk> grasbauer: hi | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:15 <cedk> grasbauer: did you make progress on the website? | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:18 <grasbauer> cedk: I'ts in progress - but we don't have a final result which design is the prefered one | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:18 <grasbauer> cedk: there was a lot of discussion without any result | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:19 <grasbauer> cedk: or I missed the result | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:19 <cedk> grasbauer: for me, it is the choise of who is implementing it | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:21 <cedk> grasbauer: so you do the job, you make decision | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:21 <grasbauer> cedk: phuuu - hard decision | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:22 <cedk> grasbauer: after that, others could still submit patches to improve it | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:24 <grasbauer> cedk: Ok - so I will do a upload of my stuff next week - this week I'm loaded with work | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:25 <cedk> grasbauer: great | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:28 <grasbauer> btw: little question to inventory: it seems that the espected_quality is only generated, if I complete all lines? because customer has done 3 inventories with a single product (because he miscounted the stock). There was no epected_quantity before and finally he has 3 Moves. The stock is the sum of the 3 inventories .... | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:30 <cedk> grasbauer: yes, I think it is design to be only used with the wizard | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:30 <cedk> bechamel: could you confirm? | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:32 <grasbauer> cedk: ok - client missed the wizzard ;) - but should we prevent this? | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:33 <cedk> grasbauer: it will be a good improvement, but I don't know how | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:33 <nicoe> grasbauer: great the ear that the website is going well | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:37 <grasbauer> cedk: complete_lines should have a parameter fill=True - so we can do complete_lines in the write method? | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:37 <grasbauer> cedk: without computing all the espected_quantity in warehouse for all products ... | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:38 <cedk> grasbauer: why not | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:40 <grasbauer> cedk: ok - I'll go for patch. Hope I remember all the upload procedure ;) | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:47 <bechamel> cedk, grasbauer: I confirm, and yes good idea | ||
| 2012-01-25 13:52 <grasbauer> bechamel: done | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:25 <emma_> hi everyone | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:26 <grasbauer> emma_: hi | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:27 <emma_> I was wondering if the payment_term was used in tryton to generate something (maybe a request or something) when an open invoice is overdue? I looked around but couldn't find anything | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:30 <bechamel> emma_: iirc the payment_term term only generates account moves when the invoice is opened | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:31 <emma_> ok | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:32 <emma_> and it isn't anywhere else either? | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:33 <emma_> (overdue invoices management I mean) | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:35 <bechamel> emma_: http://groups.google.com/group/tryton-dev/browse_thread/thread/6230d011a662f8d9/09d7efb4f83c1cbf | ||
| 2012-01-25 14:36 <emma_> bechamel: thanks | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:05 <hedayat> Hi! | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:05 <hedayat> I'd like to do something in tryton | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:05 <hedayat> which I'm almost sure that I did before | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:05 <hedayat> But I can't firgure it out now! | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:06 <hedayat> Consider that I have a user and a group | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:06 <hedayat> which has access to the "Configuration" submenu of "Party" | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:06 <hedayat> only | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:07 <hedayat> And doesn't see other menu items | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:07 <hedayat> Therefore, he sees only "Party" in the menu, with only one submenu "Configuration" | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:07 <hedayat> which has some menu entires | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:08 <hedayat> Now, I'd like the user to not see "Party" and "Configuration" submenus and only see the contents of "Configuration" submenu | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:08 <hedayat> in the menu | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:08 <hedayat> Is it possible? And how? | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:08 <hedayat> (at least, I don't want the user to see "Party". and only see "Configuration" and it's entries in the menu) | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:10 <cedk> hedayat: not possible, menu visibility is inherited from the parent | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:12 <hedayat> cedk: Oh... I wonder why I thought that I did it before! :P | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:12 <hedayat> cedk: Thanks anyway | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:12 <hedayat> :) | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:12 <hedayat> cedk: at least, it is good to know that it is impossible | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:13 <cedk> hedayat: you can create a new menu entry | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:15 <hedayat> cedk: looks like to be the only remaining solution. I didn't like to have probably many duplicated menu entries. but seems to be mandatory. thanks. | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:36 -!- hedayat(~hedayat@fedora/hedayatvk) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-01-25 15:49 <grasbauer> anybody has account_invoice_standalone in use? seems like a issue there: removing a line from a invoice should add the party to the line - else you get an error 'Party required' - can someone confirm it? | ||
| 2012-01-25 16:23 -!- bdunnette(~dunn0172@x-134-84-214-108.cla.umn.edu) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-01-25 18:31 -!- bdunnette(~dunn0172@x-134-84-214-108.cla.umn.edu) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-01-25 19:32 <marc0s> hi | ||
| 2012-01-25 19:33 <marc0s> i have a model A which has a related field and a function field that returns a fields.Char of the related object. I'm trying to search over this function field with a search function that just returns the clause | ||
| 2012-01-25 19:34 <marc0s> is this a correct way to do it? i suppose not, because my cpu's go 100% and it enters into a kind of loop (maybe the search function is called recursively?) | ||
| 2012-01-25 19:34 <marc0s> how i'm supposed to do it? :) | ||
| 2012-01-25 19:36 <marc0s> s/related/reference/ sorry | ||
| 2012-01-25 19:37 <marc0s> that's the relevant part of the code http://paste.pocoo.org/show/540640/ | ||
| 2012-01-25 19:57 <marc0s> obviously there was a mistake on how to plan the problem... i changed it to return a domain like ('id', 'in', ...) so no recursion appears | ||
| 2012-01-25 23:01 -!- bdunnette(~dunn0172@x-134-84-214-108.cla.umn.edu) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-01-25 23:52 <cjbarnes18> Hi all o/ I al looking at updateing the google translate module for 2.2, but I dont quite understand how Action keywords are supposed to work. Could someone direct me to an appropriate resource on this? |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!