chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Wed Dec 28 00:00:01 CET 2011 | ||
2011-12-28 00:32 <saxa> hi, is it demo2.3.trytond.org working ? | ||
2011-12-28 00:33 <cedk> saxa: there is no such server | ||
2011-12-28 00:33 <saxa> oh ok | ||
2011-12-28 00:33 <saxa> clear now | ||
2011-12-28 00:33 <saxa> so what sould i use as a demo for latest master hg checkout + | ||
2011-12-28 00:33 <saxa> ? | ||
2011-12-28 00:33 <saxa> demo2.2 ? | ||
2011-12-28 00:33 <cedk> saxa: latest release | ||
2011-12-28 00:34 <saxa> ok i get incompatible version of the server | ||
2011-12-28 00:34 <saxa> :) | ||
2011-12-28 00:34 <saxa> good, so its probably better to create a local database here | ||
2011-12-28 00:35 <saxa> I have cloned out both trytond and tryton hg sources | ||
2011-12-28 00:36 <cedk> saxa: I guess you are using the trunk instead of 2.2 | ||
2011-12-28 00:36 <saxa> yes | ||
2011-12-28 00:37 <saxa> your guess is correct | ||
2011-12-28 00:37 <saxa> i said latest master :) | ||
2011-12-28 00:37 <saxa> sorry for my expressions are more C then pythonistic :D | ||
2011-12-28 00:38 <saxa> you have listed simplejson 2 times in the http://doc.tryton.org/2.2/trytond/doc/topics/install.html page | ||
2011-12-28 00:38 <saxa> it is required but also optional | ||
2011-12-28 00:38 <saxa> is it the 2.3.0 version already functional ? | ||
2011-12-28 00:39 <saxa> I don't need it to be production wise stable | ||
2011-12-28 00:39 <saxa> just functional, so I can play with it | ||
2011-12-28 00:39 <saxa> or is it better to clone 2.2 ? | ||
2011-12-28 00:40 <saxa> i cloned trunk because I don't know how to clone out 2.2 , I'm not much familiar with hg | ||
2011-12-28 00:40 <cedk> saxa: simplejson is only optional but hardly recommended | ||
2011-12-28 00:41 <saxa> ok will install also this dep then | ||
2011-12-28 00:41 <cedk> saxa: we try to have trunk always stable and working | ||
2011-12-28 00:43 <saxa> ok, I undrstand, thx | ||
2011-12-28 01:23 <saxa> ok, seems that "python setup.py install --root=/tmp/pack-trytond" command doesnt copy trytond.conf file into etc dir of the --root path | ||
2011-12-28 01:27 <cedk> saxa: no it is something not supported by distutils | ||
2011-12-28 01:31 <saxa> hmm, shouldn't this be done by adding one simple line to setup.py ? | ||
2011-12-28 02:12 <saxa> in distutils i see this | ||
2011-12-28 02:12 <saxa> The data_files option can be used to specify additional files needed by the module distribution: configuration files, message catalogs, data files, anything which doesn't fit in the previous categories. | ||
2011-12-28 02:13 <saxa> so /etc/trytond.conf should go in here | ||
2011-12-28 10:44 <sampac> Hi all. I would like to limit visibility of some models to the user's own objects (create_uid = logged in user). Is there an easy way with access rights ? or should I recreate all menus with a domain ? | ||
2011-12-28 10:45 <cedk> sampac: you can use ir.rule | ||
2011-12-28 10:49 <sampac> Nice! let me check | ||
2011-12-28 11:16 <sampac> cedk: I don't manage to make the rule work. I put field:create_uid, operator: = and operand: USER | ||
2011-12-28 11:35 <sampac> cedk: ok I found. In fact anything defined in groups is stronger than what is defined in users. I'm not sure it's correct design? | ||
2011-12-28 11:37 <cedk> sampac: I don't understand | ||
2011-12-28 11:38 <cedk> sampac: all the rules are applied the same way | ||
2011-12-28 11:48 <sampac> cedk: It is not clear to me without doc what priority is applied for True versus False, for model access versus rule, etc. The only thing I'm sure is that the limitation w | ||
2011-12-28 11:48 <sampac> cedk : I was trying to add only worked when attached to the group, not to the uer | ||
2011-12-28 13:51 <sisalp> nicoe: what is the aim of gis project ? | ||
2011-12-28 13:57 <cedk> sisalp: you should ask to bioecoforests | ||
2011-12-28 14:04 <pilou> sisalp: we want handle geographic data with tryton. | ||
2011-12-28 14:54 <jcm> hi all! How can I search a Party from a phone number? (useful to answer to phone calls) | ||
2011-12-28 15:04 <bechamel> jcm: it's not doable | ||
2011-12-28 15:38 <jcm> bechamel: could be done, isn't it? seems this sql would do it: select name from party_party left join party_contact_mechanism pcm on pcm.party=party_party.id where pcm.value like 'search str%'; | ||
2011-12-28 15:39 <jcm> but maybe the text search engine presented on 11/11 would be better for this | ||
2011-12-28 15:42 <bechamel> jcm: the easiest solution is to improve search_rec_name on party to do this join automaticaly | ||
2011-12-28 15:46 <bechamel> jcm: I don't know how this use case will be handled by a fts btw | ||
2011-12-28 16:18 -!- sampac(~sampaccou@def92-7-82-231-203-127.fbx.proxad.net) has left #tryton | ||
2011-12-28 16:36 <albertca> @nicoe: are you there? | ||
2011-12-28 16:40 <nicoe> yes | ||
2011-12-28 16:40 <cedk> albertca: without @ it works better ;-) | ||
2011-12-28 16:40 <albertca> cedk: I'm mixing communication channels :D | ||
2011-12-28 16:41 <albertca> nicoe: saw your patch for tryton client regarding binary fields | ||
2011-12-28 16:41 <nicoe> albertca: I closed it finally | ||
2011-12-28 16:42 <albertca> nicoe: does it now fill the field name and size when editing in tree view? | ||
2011-12-28 16:42 <albertca> nicoe: I was about to open an issue about that but I'm not sure if it was because my patch was wrong | ||
2011-12-28 16:43 <nicoe> no you're patch is fine | ||
2011-12-28 16:43 <nicoe> I think the bug is there since the beginning | ||
2011-12-28 16:44 <albertca> nicoe: Ok. Can you take a look at that? I don't know the client enough yet | ||
2011-12-28 16:44 <albertca> nicoe: Do you want me to fill in a bug report | ||
2011-12-28 16:44 <albertca> ? | ||
2011-12-28 16:47 <nicoe> albertca: please do so. Thanks | ||
2011-12-28 16:50 <albertca> nicoe: Ok. Done: issue2369 | ||
2011-12-28 22:01 -!- scrapper(~scrapper@88.117.159.6) has left #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!