IRC logs of #tryton for Thursday, 2011-12-15

chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Dec 15 00:00:01 CET 2011
2011-12-15 08:09 <sampac> cedk: Morning. An information I couldn't find: is it possible to disable the "create new" button on a one2many widget ? I want to allow only add/remove of existing records. (solution other than access rights because the records must be created on another view)
2011-12-15 15:28 <reichlich> cedk, can I run tests without recreating the test database for every run?
2011-12-15 15:51 <cedk> reichlich: no
2011-12-15 15:52 <reichlich> cedk, should the test for issue203002 placed into the company module?
2011-12-15 15:53 <cedk> reichlich: no
2011-12-15 15:54 <reichlich> cedk, where else?
2011-12-15 15:54 <cedk> reichlich: in trytons
2011-12-15 15:54 <cedk> reichlich: in trytond
2011-12-15 15:55 <reichlich> cedk, but the company module extends the property model
2011-12-15 15:58 <cedk> reichlich: yes and what does it have with the issue?
2011-12-15 16:04 <reichlich> cedk, is it not the main thing with the property field, that it stores company based?
2011-12-15 16:09 <cedk> reichlich: but it has nothing to do with the issue
2011-12-15 16:14 <reichlich> cedk, ok
2011-12-15 20:25 <udono> hi, someone has an idea if the view title given in the string attribute of form or tree element in xml should change according to the view type? E.g. when I open party tree, the title is 'Parties'. When changing to form view, the title is also 'Parties' instead of 'Party'. Is this behavior correct?
2011-12-15 20:26 <cedk> udono: for me, it is ok because you are on a list
2011-12-15 20:35 <udono> cedk: but why defining ir.ui.view with <form string=...> and <tree string=...> instead of using the id from the record to identify views?
2011-12-15 20:41 <udono> cedk: Is the string attribute needed elsewhere? For me it looks like it is no longer needed, but must be defined on every view and translated. The user never sees the content of the string attribute.
2011-12-15 20:43 <cedk> udono: indeed, it uses first the name of the action if there is none, it uses the string of the first view
2011-12-15 20:44 <cedk> udono: but perhaps there is a better way to do
2011-12-15 20:47 <udono> cedk: maybe, when string attribute would be required on ir.action.act_window, we don't need the string attribute on form and tree views. Sounds like a big change. And we already have many big changes in 2.3.
2011-12-15 20:48 <cedk> udono: it is already required
2011-12-15 20:48 <cedk> udono: indeed there is some cases where the client create a view without an act_window
2011-12-15 20:48 <cedk> udono: like when opening a many2one
2011-12-15 20:48 <cedk> udono: but perhaps it is possible to find always a solution
2011-12-15 20:49 <cedk> udono: like for many2one using the label of the field
2011-12-15 20:50 <cedk> udono: I think it is a good idea to try to remove string from XML
2011-12-15 21:38 <superkaos> hello, anybody knows of a good manual for tryton?
2011-12-15 23:03 <cedk> superkaos: a manual for which usage?

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!