| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Nov 17 00:00:01 CET 2011 | ||
| 2011-11-17 07:35 <zxq9> In the docs it looks like <field name="spam" domain="[('foo', '=', 'bar')]"/> is the syntax for including a domain in a relation field in XML. | ||
| 2011-11-17 07:35 <zxq9> But I think this is wrong; I get errors. What am I doing wrong? | ||
| 2011-11-17 07:51 <zxq9> Ah, NM. Putting inside the python code is better. | ||
| 2011-11-17 08:59 <udono> zxq9: hi, setting the context for a field is done only in python code. | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:30 <cedk> grasbauer: what is the difference between identifier and code in the module product_variant? | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:33 <grasbauer> cedk: We have a case where the product code for XL-red-cotton is something like 3488XX12 - so I thought that identifier is like a human readable field of the combination | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:34 <cedk> grasbauer: will it not be better to just link the product to the attribute values ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:37 <grasbauer> cedk: ok - and a function field to show this linked attributes in one field? | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:45 <cedk> grasbauer: it could but perhaps it is custom | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:47 <grasbauer> cedk: I think, that it would be more userfriendly to know for which attributes te variant stands for | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:47 <grasbauer> cedk: but you are right - this should be linked | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:49 <cedk> grasbauer: but attributes you already know via the template | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:51 <grasbauer> cedk: yes - but the variant don't know, for which combination of the possible attributes it stands - this you can read from the code possibly -but it could be hard to understand | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:53 <cedk> grasbauer: but when you know the values, you also know the attributes | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:53 <grasbauer> cedk: yes - I misunderstood your question | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:54 <cedk> grasbauer: I did a first review, don't be affraid of the number of comments :-) | ||
| 2011-11-17 10:55 <grasbauer> cedk: I was talking about attributes but meant the values - will link the values to the product ... | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:01 <ivanb> hellp | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:01 <ivanb> can't install tryton...i just get Fetching databases list when trying to connect | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:05 <cedk> ivanb: did you try to create a database from menu client File>Database>New Database ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:06 <ivanb> no | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:06 <ivanb> when i enter ip and port | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:07 <ivanb> it just displays fetching database list for ever | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:07 <grasbauer> cedk: not afraid of the comments - espected more ... | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:09 <cedk> grasbauer: indeed, the issue you could face is that as you already have it in production, you will have more work to do with refactoring | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:09 <ivanb> i dont know how to proced | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:09 <cedk> grasbauer: that's why we encourage people to talk and review at the beginning | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:10 <ivanb> looks like client connects to server, server tries to connect to postgres, but connection somehow doesnt return | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:10 <cedk> ivanb: it is perhaps an ipv6 vs ipv4 issue? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:10 <cedk> ivanb: is the user running trytond has connection right to postgresql? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:11 <ivanb> user running tryton is root...i specified connection parametes in tryton.conf | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:12 <bechamel> ivanb: test your db connection with "createdb test" in a shell (with the user running trytond) | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:12 <ivanb> ok | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:16 <ivanb> i get permission denied to create database | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:17 <cedk> ivanb: you must create the equivalent user to PostgreSQL using: createuser | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:17 <cedk> ivanb: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/app-createuser.html | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:24 <ivanb> now i can createdb, with root and tryton users | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:24 <ivanb> however, no luck with fetching.... | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:24 <bechamel> ivanb: now create a db from the tryton client | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:27 <ivanb> i first tried to change server addres from demo2.0.tryton.org:8070 to 192.168.0.1.103:8000 | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:27 <ivanb> however,now client is frozen with wait cursor | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:28 <cedk> ivanb: which version are you using? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:29 <cedk> ivanb: because you talk about demo2.0 but you use the port of 2.2? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:29 <ivanb> no, i have ubuntu 11.10 | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:29 <ivanb> i apt-get tryton and it got me 2.0 | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:29 <ivanb> then i downloaded client 2.0. | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:31 <cedk> ivanb: so the default port is 8070 not 8000 | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:35 <ivanb> oh my god, it works now | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:36 <ivanb> i made a mistake because i imagined i must first choose profile and whole port stuff | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:42 <ivanb> i have commeted out postgress connection settings...are they not important? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:43 <ivanb> also is there a configuration script, that would config tryton and postgres | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:44 <cedk> ivanb: it is up to your own personal taste | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:48 <sisalp> Hi, yesterday, I experimented some problems with ssl connections | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:49 <sisalp> I rm -r .config/tryton/2.2 and it is fixed. rm known_hosts was not enough | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:50 <sisalp> is there a more clever way to do it ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:51 <bechamel> sisalp: did you tried to install the ssl lib ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:55 <cedk> sisalp: ha ok, once you connect to a server, tryton client remember the configuration | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:56 <cedk> sisalp: it is like the know_hosts of openssh | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:59 <sisalp> cedk: so removing known_hosts should be enough to change the server from ssl-yes to ssl-no and vice-versa ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 11:59 <sisalp> I'll check it | ||
| 2011-11-17 12:02 <cedk> sisalp: yes | ||
| 2011-11-17 12:03 <ivanb> bye and thanks for help! | ||
| 2011-11-17 12:59 <abeamud> Hi all... It's possible to put the client address in all invoice pages in a report? | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:00 <grasbauer> abeamud: yes - in header or footer of the document | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:01 <abeamud> grasbauer: from header I can access objects model? | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:03 <grasbauer> abeamud: one moment | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:05 <grasbauer> abeamud: http://grasbauer.com/sale.odt - a example with something in the footer | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:07 <cedk> abeamud: be careful that by default header are replaced by the company one | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:09 <abeamud> cedk: I need to adjust in some way the header to not overlap? | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:10 <abeamud> cedk: Or If I not use the <style> header I can put in the main odt using the header and footer? | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:11 <abeamud> grasbauer: You are not using the <field name="style">header.odt</filed>, no? | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:12 <grasbauer> abeamud: not in this case - but if you don't use it, you have to change each report, if somthing changes in the company :-/ | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:13 <abeamud> grasbauer: Ah, ok... | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:13 <abeamud> grasbauer: a lot of thanks | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:15 <cedk> grasbauer: I will propose to remove the company header stuffs | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:15 <cedk> grasbauer: I think it is unmanageable | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:16 <abeamud> cedk: and then define in all reports a style with the header? | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:20 <cedk> abeamud: yep | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:24 <abeamud> cedk: +1 | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:46 -!- ciupicri(~ciupicri@unaffiliated/ciupicri) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:51 <grasbauer> cedk: you think, that in the variant stuff a kind of 'human readable'-field in the listview isn't neccessary? Just to know, which attribute.values are choosen? | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:57 <cedk> grasbauer: I think that by default the code should be enough | ||
| 2011-11-17 13:58 <grasbauer> cedk: ok - so I will extend the module for me only ;) | ||
| 2011-11-17 14:14 <cedk> grasbauer: I'm not the only one to decide if enough people agree that it must be in default... | ||
| 2011-11-17 14:16 <grasbauer> cedk: I think it should not be a default - each function field slows down the view ... | ||
| 2011-11-17 14:24 <cedk> grasbauer: normally not that much, but I really don't like function field that just concatanate one2many | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:22 <sisalp> hi, looking for "duplicate", "import", "export", "delete" in menus and cannot find them. What do I miss ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:25 <nicoe> You missed the new menu | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:25 <nicoe> on a brand new client I presume | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:25 <nicoe> The new menu is obtained by clicking on the some tool icon | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:25 <nicoe> right next to the title | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:30 <pheller> Production module contributions now total €1000. :-) | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:34 <sisalp> nicoe : I'm looking in application menus on top of the window | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:34 <nicoe> sisalp: it is inside the tab | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:35 <nicoe> because those actions are linked to the content of the tab | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:37 <sisalp> damned ! it is ok, just the user is bugging on update ;-) I think it is the right place | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:37 <nicoe> pheller: \o/ | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:39 <pheller> wish I could have come to the TUL, but too much to do with school and my normal job. Hopefully I can come to the next one. | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:40 <nicoe> we might organize it somewhere else next year. still in europe (that's where the majority of the community is) but somewhere else | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:41 <nicoe> That's something to be discussed | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:41 <pheller> nicoe: I understand. My vote is for either Munich or somewhere nice in Italy…. then my girlfriend will approve ;-) | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:42 <nicoe> I vote go for a place where I have never been ;) | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:43 <nicoe> so south italy is good for me (and in November it's probably one of the only place where it's still warm) | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:43 <nicoe> or north of Finland would be cool too ... :) | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:44 <pheller> hah -- why not try and schedule the next unconference to be a little closer to summer. maybe late august / early september. Then, more locations are acceptable. | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:47 <nicoe> we want to make the unconference some time after the release | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:47 <nicoe> so we are in may/june or november/december | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:48 <pheller> ah ha, good point. | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:48 <pheller> I like may/june ;-) | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:49 <nicoe> me too | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:50 <nicoe> but six month is kind of short | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:50 <pheller> yeah, true. | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:50 <nicoe> maybe for the third time ... | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:50 <sisalp> UndefinedError: {} has no member named "full_name" when trying to print a sale on a freshly configured database | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:52 <sisalp> File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/genshi/template/eval.py", line 403, in undefined is the line | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:53 <sisalp> I suspect my system to be faulty since it is my first time on 2.2 | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:53 <nicoe> sisalp: you're trying to get a report | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:53 <nicoe> is it a custom report ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:55 <sisalp> no it is the sale order | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:55 <nicoe> with a standard installation I suppose | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:56 <sisalp> the client claims ascii codec cannot ....0x8e at position 98 | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:57 <sisalp> as standard as I could : installing dependencies and running from sources | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:57 <nicoe> This is not the real error. I think the unicode error is there because trytond send the error message in french | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:58 <nicoe> I'll try to reproduce it | ||
| 2011-11-17 16:58 <sisalp> I check dependencies | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:01 <sisalp> dependencies "seem" ok | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:02 <sisalp> the customer has no addresses set, may it is related | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:02 <nicoe> Indeed | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:03 <nicoe> genshi tries to get the full_name information but can not find it (according to the error message) | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:03 <sisalp> yes but I don't know what is the full_name | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:11 <sisalp> I'm on admin@t22.s101.tryton-online.com:8221/ttryton22 with password admin | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:13 <nicoe> I can not reproduce it | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:14 <sisalp> created a customer, a supplier, two products, one payment term and set a fiscal year on minimal chart. | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:21 <nicoe> Yep that's what I did | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:21 <nicoe> (without the supplier and products) | ||
| 2011-11-17 17:58 <sisalp> invoice is working correctly | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:00 <sisalp> general comment : on a sale order : invoice and shipment : "Manual" is misleading. We should consider "No invoice" and "No shipment" instead | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:01 <cedk> sisalp: good point | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:01 <cedk> sisalp: create an issue | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:01 <cedk> sisalp: even we should talk if such option is needed | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:04 <sisalp> cedk: in my previously explained vision, no, it is not useful, but today I thing we need it. | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:05 <cedk> sisalp: do you have a business case in mind? | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:08 <sisalp> I had a discussion with NAN at TUL. he explained me he added 'to be invoiced' shipments in financial menu, so accountant can feed himself his frat invoice list | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:08 <sisalp> draft | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:09 <cedk> sisalp: ok but is not it because of the poor API of OpenERP? | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:09 <cedk> ACTION NAN should be on irc | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:12 <sisalp> I thought it was tryton | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:12 <cedk> sisalp: don't know, but I think they have not yet Tryton customer | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:13 <sisalp> the point is that if at sale level you decide "invoice on shipment", then the ship-man ships and this creates an draft invoice | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:14 <cedk> sisalp: yes as expected :-) | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:15 <sisalp> it may be oe return on experience yes. | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:16 <sisalp> yes as expected. This was what we had problem with. | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:18 <sisalp> but we shouldn't reopen the point now | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:20 <cedk> sisalp: no but we need to decide if there is valid cases where you want "No invoice/shipment" | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:22 <sisalp> my free hosting is of that kind: it a unit of service (open an account), no invoice, but I need an order for a contractual relationship | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:26 <cedk> sisalp: for me, it is not a sale but a subscription | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:29 <zodman> some one record the POS POC ? almost on phone ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:29 <zodman> on TUL ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:29 <zodman> someone* | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:30 <cedk> zodman: I don't think it was the second day | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:32 <Timitos> zodman: there was not more than you already could see on the POS videos. you know them? | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:32 <sisalp> cedk: I can use sales for this, because I don't have periodic renewal. It is a kind of one shot service, and I don't have a better module today. | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:33 <zodman> yes Timitos but i want to see on TUL will be more updated. the existed on youtube i show you a friend and not understand. | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:33 <cedk> sisalp: and what about price = 0 ? | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:34 <cedk> ACTION bbl | ||
| 2011-11-17 18:35 <Timitos> zodman: there was no more progress on POS for the moment. there is still much work to do i think. | ||
| 2011-11-17 22:52 <jmsbrry> Telesight: Well its a long way back but everything went fine and I think I am over the jet lag |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!