| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Nov 3 00:00:02 CET 2011 | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:23 <cedk> cjbarnes18: no, but I'm not yet sure about the solution | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:24 <cedk> cjbarnes18: I have asked to the mailing list | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:24 <cedk> cjbarnes18: so let's see who others react | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:25 <cjbarnes18> cedk: I am in two minds with the solution, would prefer to find where it gets added to the pool... | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:26 <cjbarnes18> cedk: does the client start connection attempt as soon as create is started? | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:27 <cedk> cjbarnes18: it is possble | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:28 <cjbarnes18> cedk: guess I'll take a look see. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:28 <cedk> cjbarnes18: did you look at Pool.start | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:30 <cjbarnes18> cedk: yes, if I read correctly it adds databases that are in the config. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:31 <cjbarnes18> other that that they are added on open or after create, think I need to make a more thorough search. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:34 <cedk> cjbarnes18: I'm wondering if you could not use the Pool._locks to see if you can start the cron or not | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:37 <cjbarnes18> cedk: hmm, I think I need to find where it is added to the pool 1st.. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:40 <cedk> cjbarnes18: where what is added to the pool? | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:41 <cjbarnes18> the new incomplete database. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:43 <cedk> cjbarnes18: in Pool.init | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:43 <cjbarnes18> cedk: in the create process it is added after database.init | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:45 <cjbarnes18> cedk: i'll go do some more digging, will shout if I run into trouble. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:46 <cedk> cjbarnes18: database.init just load the boostrap SQL | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:47 <cedk> cjbarnes18: the issue is that the database is added in self._pool at the beginning | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:48 <cedk> cjbarnes18: so the cron thinks it is a ready database | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:48 <cjbarnes18> cedk: yes, this is how I understand the problem. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:50 <cjbarnes18> cedk: so I am looking for where that is happening. I am guessing at the client but need to verify. | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:51 <cedk> cjbarnes18: which client? | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:51 <cjbarnes18> cedk: tryton client | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:54 <cedk> cjbarnes18: it has nothing to do with the client | ||
| 2011-11-03 00:56 <cjbarnes18> cedk: ok, well I'm starting the search in trytond. | ||
| 2011-11-03 02:07 <cjbarnes18> cedk: I added some debug to help me understand, now I see what you meant with pool.init, thanks for your time. | ||
| 2011-11-03 02:08 <cjbarnes18> cedk: i assumed that database.init did everything. | ||
| 2011-11-03 02:09 <cedk> cjbarnes18: ok | ||
| 2011-11-03 06:59 <zxq9> Is it possible to have two fields on a form view, and have one update the other when the cursor leaves the field? | ||
| 2011-11-03 06:59 <zxq9> centimeters <--> inches automatic conversion within the form, for example? | ||
| 2011-11-03 08:30 <udono> zxq9: 'check on_change' and 'on_change_with' and don't forget 'depends' | ||
| 2011-11-03 08:32 <zxq9> Ah, in the python fields.*() definition, not the xml form, then? | ||
| 2011-11-03 08:34 <zxq9> Found a good example. Thank you very much! | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:38 <zxq9> Is there any way to may a selection drop box take up only 1 column? | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:41 <zxq9> colspan="1" gives me 2 column-wide selection boxes, and colspan="0" makes the whole thing 0 columns/invisible -- the selection strings are only 1 character, so its a bit weird looking. | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:42 <cedk> zxq9: it takes only 1 columns by default | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:45 <zxq9> Its taking two. | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:47 <cedk> zxq9: it is not possible as it is like that in many form view | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:47 <zxq9> ok | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:49 <cedk> zxq9: show the XML | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:50 <zxq9> You're right. I found the problem now. | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:51 <zxq9> Need a larger number of columns to control this and adjust other fields to get the correct proportion (maybe). | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:53 <zxq9> No, nevermind... its still really wide. | ||
| 2011-11-03 11:54 <zxq9> The field is currently on a line by itself. Would that make a difference? | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:00 <cedk> zxq9: don't know, show the XML | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:03 <zxq9> http://pastebin.com/7m53PyQN | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:03 <zxq9> Do you need more of the XML to know? | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:04 <zxq9> Its the very last field "dob_jp_era" that is the silliest looking. | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:07 <cedk> zxq9: I think it is because above it you get only fields with colspan=2 | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:08 <cedk> zxq9: but I must say that a form with 16 columns it is for me non-userfriendly | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:08 <zxq9> It was originally 8 columns, I switched to 16 columns to see if the problem was fixed, but nothing changed. | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:09 <zxq9> I'll finish the form and see what happens. I might ask you again later. Thanks for checking. | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:09 <cedk> zxq9: and is not a large options in the selection? | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:10 <zxq9> No, not for this one. Only one letter wide, only three options. | ||
| 2011-11-03 12:10 <zxq9> The values are "H" "S" and "T" only. | ||
| 2011-11-03 15:25 <sharoon> we have unclean `stop()`ing of Transactions when an exception occurs during the start | ||
| 2011-11-03 15:25 <sharoon> has anybody else faced this issue ? | ||
| 2011-11-03 15:25 <sharoon> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/502264/ | ||
| 2011-11-03 15:27 <sharoon> i don't think this problem will be seen when running trytond daemon (except if something happens to the database connection in b/w like a timeout or cursor creation failure) | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:06 <cedk> sharoon: I guess it is the self.cursor.close() in Transaction.stop that should be catched | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:18 -!- hoRn(~jan@business-088-079-110-234.static.arcor-ip.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:41 <sharoon> cedk: it doesn't reach Transaction().stop | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:41 <sharoon> cedk: the blow up happens in start itself | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:55 <cedk> sharoon: so assignation of user should come after database connection | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:55 <sharoon> cedk: yes | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:55 <sharoon> cedk: that solves the problem for now | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:58 <sharoon> cedk: do you want me to propose a patch and write a test case ? | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:58 <cedk> sharoon: yes | ||
| 2011-11-03 16:58 <sharoon> cedk: there is no test_transaction.py (do you want me to create or include in any other file ?) | ||
| 2011-11-03 17:00 <cedk> sharoon: create | ||
| 2011-11-03 17:00 <sharoon> cedk: thanks | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:20 <udono> hi, has anyone an idea if and how I can create a domain in xml like [('user', '=', active_user_id)]? 'user' is a field in the model 'active_user_id' should be the id of the actual user which starts the action. | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:21 <cedk> udono: using the context | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:27 <udono> cedk: thanks. I try it with [('user', '=', Get(Eval('context', {}), 'user_id', False))] and [('user', '=', Get(Eval('context', {}), 'user', False))] but both will not work. | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:28 <udono> oh, I see missing .id in field name... | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:32 <udono> Does not work. The domains are accepted, but there are not the expected results. I try with [('user.id', '=', Get(Eval('context', {}), 'user_id', False))] and [('user.id', '=', Get(Eval('context', {}), 'user', False))] | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:34 <cedk> udono: user id is not in the context | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:35 <cedk> udono: it is _user | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:35 <udono> cedk: IC | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:45 <udono> cedk: thanks for the hints. Now I tried with [('user.id', '=', Get(Eval('context', {}), '_user', False))] but it shows no results, but it should. When changing the domain in XML it seems needed to 1. delete the involved ir.actions, 2. make a database update, 3. recreate ir.action with new domain, and 4. again database update. | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:46 <udono> all on 2.0.3 | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:47 <cedk> udono: I don't understand | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:49 <udono> cedk: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/502394/ | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:50 <udono> cedk: when using menu_reminder_user_view it should show only the entries of the actual user. | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:52 <udono> but using this domain, the view tree shows no results. | ||
| 2011-11-03 18:57 <cedk> udono: [('user', '=', Eval('_user'))] | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:06 <udono> cedk: yes, its defined in res.request. But no results on my first tries. Since it is working on res.request, this is the way to go for me. Thanks. | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:36 <udono> cedk: FYI it seems to be a 2.0 issue. On tip it works as expected with http://paste.pocoo.org/show/502419/. Is it worth to file a bug? | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:41 <sharoon> cedk: how do you tackle the possible issue in self.cursor.close() | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:42 <sharoon> cedk: do you want to push it to the end ? | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:42 <cedk> udono: we should fix 2.0 | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:43 <cedk> sharoon: I will just catch all exception | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:43 <sharoon> cedk: you mean a try.. except.. finally...handler ? | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:45 <cedk> sharoon: yes | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:45 <sharoon> cedk: ok | ||
| 2011-11-03 19:48 <udono> cedk: ok | ||
| 2011-11-03 20:00 <sharoon> cedk: i have fixed according to what you have said | ||
| 2011-11-03 20:01 <sharoon> ACTION brb | ||
| 2011-11-03 21:53 -!- hoRn(~jan@business-088-079-110-234.static.arcor-ip.net) has left #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!