IRC logs of #tryton for Wednesday, 2011-06-29

chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Wed Jun 29 00:00:02 CEST 2011
2011-06-29 00:06 -!- mhi(~mhi@pd95b104a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 00:57 -!- ciupicri|away(~ciupicri@81.180.234.249) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 02:46 -!- elbenfreund(~elbenfreu@p57A0C0C5.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 03:49 -!- ciupicri(~ciupicri@81.180.234.249) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 04:39 -!- serpent223(~digger@teralink.net) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 05:09 -!- zodman_(~zodman@201.141.234.148) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 05:19 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F3A9F.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 06:39 -!- gremly(~gremly@200.106.202.91) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 07:01 -!- predatell(~predatell@85.198.132.141) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 08:41 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 08:44 -!- okko(~okko@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 08:52 -!- mhi(~mhi@pd95b104a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 09:07 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 09:15 -!- farid(~farid@94.182.116.244) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 09:25 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 10:10 -!- tray(cb72a676@gateway/web/freenode/ip.203.114.166.118) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 10:41 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@91.179.69.169) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 10:57 -!- bechamel(~user@cismwks02-virtual1.cism.ucl.ac.be) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 11:03 -!- sharoon(~sharoon@204-232-205-248.static.cloud-ips.com) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 11:03 <sharoon> cedk: ping
2011-06-29 11:04 <cedk> sharoon: hi
2011-06-29 11:04 <sharoon> cedk: travelling these days, so not connected fulltime
2011-06-29 11:05 <cedk> sharoon: ok, when will you be back?
2011-06-29 11:05 <sharoon> cedk: I am connected till 2nd and then again only on 8th
2011-06-29 11:05 <cedk> sharoon: don't understand
2011-06-29 11:06 <sharoon> cedk: i am available fulltime till 2nd (so will be on IRC). and then will not be available till 8th
2011-06-29 11:06 <cedk> sharoon: ok
2011-06-29 11:21 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 11:42 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@95.87.233.210) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 11:43 -!- sharoon(~sharoon@110.234.18.80) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 11:43 -!- sharoon_(~sharoon@204-232-205-248.static.cloud-ips.com) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 12:07 -!- elbenfreund(~elbenfreu@p57A0BD02.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 12:32 <sharoon> cedk: did you know that fabien "wants to avoid people that sells proprietary modules & open core possibilities (like..... tryton)"
2011-06-29 12:37 <cedk> sharoon: yes
2011-06-29 12:37 <cedk> sharoon: but it did not understand the license
2011-06-29 12:38 <cedk> sharoon: the all talk abour derivative work
2011-06-29 12:38 <cedk> sharoon: but any way, if he is attacking us like that it is because he is afraid of
2011-06-29 12:38 <sharoon> cedk: agree
2011-06-29 12:39 <cedk> sharoon: all the talk about the license is strange because nobody understand the real concern about it
2011-06-29 12:39 <cedk> sharoon: it is that OpenERP wants to keep the all control of it
2011-06-29 12:39 <sharoon> cedk: one doubt, why is such an exception required ?
2011-06-29 12:39 <cedk> sharoon: like that they can change the license how they want
2011-06-29 12:39 <sharoon> cedk: i dont think such an exception is required to address the purpose
2011-06-29 12:40 <cedk> sharoon: so if one day they want they can make it closed sources
2011-06-29 12:41 <cedk> and this is the big issue of not sharing the copyright with other contributions
2011-06-29 12:41 <sharoon> cedk: exactly
2011-06-29 12:41 <sharoon> cedk: are odony's claims true that they dont have your code anymore ?
2011-06-29 12:42 <cedk> sharoon: they rewrite the one I show
2011-06-29 12:43 <cedk> sharoon: but there is still some part like vatnumber, some stuffs in the client
2011-06-29 12:43 <cedk> sharoon: the more funny is that he was asking to me if there is no more of my code left
2011-06-29 12:43 <cedk> I answered that it is not my job to look if their devs take my code
2011-06-29 12:44 <sharoon> cedk: lol
2011-06-29 12:44 <cedk> if they want to change the license they must make a audit of the code
2011-06-29 12:45 <sharoon> cedk: exactly, and the claim itself is so funny. that all modules with the author as OpenERP or Tiny is now with this exception
2011-06-29 12:46 <cedk> sharoon: also when they say AGPL is better for SAAS indeed it is "it is better for our SAAS"
2011-06-29 12:46 <sharoon> cedk: my question rather is does AGPL require that modules developed can never be private ?
2011-06-29 12:46 <cedk> sharoon: because they are the only one who is able to run it at lower cost
2011-06-29 12:47 <cedk> sharoon: everybody else will need to make pressure on OpenERP SA to get the fixes pushed
2011-06-29 12:47 <cedk> so this close the market of SAAS because of their closed development process
2011-06-29 12:48 <sharoon> cedk: ok makes sense now
2011-06-29 12:50 <cedk> sharoon: I find also funny the proposal of rvalyi about making a foundation to sale modules with exception
2011-06-29 12:51 <sharoon> cedk: well strictly speaking i dont think it can be done, and OpenERP SA will be happy to sue anybody and everybody for that
2011-06-29 12:53 <bechamel> also; when odony say "@version2beta If a provider did that, OpenERP SA could withdraw the written permission and force them back to AGPL,to guarantee fairness", he forget to add ".. except if the provider is openerp itself"
2011-06-29 12:54 <bechamel> IMO the agpl and this agpl+exception is a competition-killer on the saas market
2011-06-29 12:55 <cedk> all this make me thing that OpenERP SA show himself as the god of Open Source that will punish anybody not play with their rules
2011-06-29 13:00 <sharoon> cedk: the most important concern should be "if they can change from one license to another despite such resistance, they could be prop. anytime too ?"
2011-06-29 13:00 <cedk> ACTION wondering why people continue to top-post on ml
2011-06-29 13:00 <cedk> sharoon: yes of course
2011-06-29 13:00 <cedk> sharoon: you must trust the "OpenERP SA" company to keep going this way
2011-06-29 13:01 -!- sharoon_(~sharoon@110.234.18.80) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 13:02 -!- sharoon(~sharoon@204-232-205-248.static.cloud-ips.com) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 13:04 <cedk> sharoon: about the closed modules, I think it is the choice of the user to use them or not
2011-06-29 13:04 <sharoon> cedk: so you really dont require an alternate license right ?
2011-06-29 13:04 <cedk> sharoon: same for an SAAS (which will use them)
2011-06-29 13:05 <cedk> sharoon: for me, almost all the guys on OpenERP don't understand how license apply
2011-06-29 13:05 <cedk> it is about "derivative work" not technical concern about the "linkage" or whatever
2011-06-29 13:06 <cedk> sharoon: moreover, I'm pretty sure that OE doesn't respect his own AGPL license
2011-06-29 13:06 <cedk> if you read it, it says that the application must provide a link to download the running code
2011-06-29 13:07 <sharoon> cedk: yep
2011-06-29 13:07 <cedk> sharoon: for me, it is something very complicated to do
2011-06-29 13:07 <sharoon> cedk: and there is no such thing in the GTK/Web clients
2011-06-29 13:07 <cedk> sharoon: nope
2011-06-29 13:07 <sharoon> cedk: also each module will need link ?
2011-06-29 13:07 <cedk> sharoon: yes but indeed it is the *running* code that must be downloaded
2011-06-29 13:08 <cedk> sharoon: not the one that was published somewhere because you must be sure that it is exactly the same
2011-06-29 13:08 <sharoon> cedk: what does that mean ? a facility to download the version of code ebing run on the server ?
2011-06-29 13:08 <cedk> for me, AGPL is so complex to respect that I don't want to use it
2011-06-29 13:08 <cedk> sharoon: yes
2011-06-29 13:08 <sharoon> cedk: that's scary!
2011-06-29 13:09 <cedk> sharoon: for any one accessing the service
2011-06-29 13:09 <cedk> sharoon: so for example, the SSO webclient of OE (which is on google market) must have a download link on its login screen
2011-06-29 13:09 <sharoon> cedk: so if openerp launches prop. modules on the saas no one can question because they have the enterprise
2011-06-29 13:10 <cedk> but it was not there that why I asked for it but nobody answered
2011-06-29 13:11 <cedk> sharoon: not because of that, it will depend if the "prop. modules" are a "derivative work" of some code which is under the GPL or AGPL
2011-06-29 13:13 <cedk> ACTION lunch
2011-06-29 13:22 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@91.179.69.169) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 13:54 -!- sharoon_(~sharoon@110.234.18.80) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 13:54 -!- sharoon__(~sharoon@204-232-205-248.static.cloud-ips.com) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 14:15 -!- dba(~daniel@178.63.150.30) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 14:19 -!- serpent213(~digger@teralink.net) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 14:51 -!- dfamorato(~dfamorato@2001:470:5:630:cabc:c8ff:fe9b:26b7) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 14:54 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 15:31 -!- ciupicri(~ciupicri@81.180.234.249) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 15:33 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 15:54 -!- sharoon(~sharoon@110.234.18.80) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 15:55 -!- sharoon_(~sharoon@204-232-205-248.static.cloud-ips.com) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 16:27 <zodman> ping sharoon the electronic-mail from bitbucket not show the menuentry Email Management it that correct ?¿
2011-06-29 16:27 <sharoon> zodman: the menu is under admini.. > users >
2011-06-29 16:29 <zodman> ok ok i not really understanding the xml file. sorry
2011-06-29 16:35 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 16:38 -!- bechamel(~user@cismwks02-virtual1.cism.ucl.ac.be) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 16:44 -!- saxa(~sasa@189.26.255.43) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 17:16 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton
2011-06-29 17:38 <cedk> ACTION on crusade against top-posting
2011-06-29 17:39 <nicoe> :D
2011-06-29 17:41 <cedk> nicoe: too much new commers that do know the netiquette
2011-06-29 17:41 <nicoe> cedk: s/do/& not
2011-06-29 17:42 <nicoe> I am awaiting the people that will post html only messages
2011-06-29 17:43 <cedk> nicoe: I think google group fix it
2011-06-29 17:44 <nicoe> good
2011-06-29 17:45 <cedk> nicoe: indeed I thought I saw this feature but now I did not find it
2011-06-29 17:45 <cedk> nicoe: so perhaps there is not
2011-06-29 17:46 <nicoe> Maybe they are catched by the anti-spam feature
2011-06-29 17:48 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 17:50 -!- dfamorato(~dfamorato@2001:470:5:630:cabc:c8ff:fe9b:26b7) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 18:04 -!- alimon(~alimon@189.154.30.225) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 18:19 -!- sharoon_(~sharoon@110.234.18.80) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 18:20 -!- sharoon__(~sharoon@184-106-202-59.static.cloud-ips.com) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 19:16 -!- saxa(~sasa@189.26.255.43) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 19:26 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@helpoort.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 19:26 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@helpoort.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton
2011-06-29 19:45 -!- elbenfreund(~elbenfreu@89.204.137.80) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 19:45 -!- dfamorato(~dfamorato@2001:470:5:630:cabc:c8ff:fe9b:26b7) has left #tryton
2011-06-29 20:36 -!- elbenfreund(~elbenfreu@p54B94E7C.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 20:43 -!- vladimirek(~vladimire@adsl-dyn24.78-98-14.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 21:36 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@dynamic-adsl-94-34-187-59.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 21:38 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@105.64-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 21:59 -!- okko(~okko@dhcp-077-251-140-095.chello.nl) has joined #tryton
2011-06-29 23:32 -!- bechamel(~user@host-85-201-144-79.brutele.be) has joined #tryton

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!