chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Oct 7 00:00:02 CEST 2010 | ||
2010-10-07 01:00 <cedk> pheller: fixed | ||
2010-10-07 01:00 <pheller> cedk: thanks, sorry for that | ||
2010-10-07 01:00 <cedk> pheller: but don't use changeset number in comment because numbers are not fixed | ||
2010-10-07 01:00 <cedk> pheller: you must use sha1 | ||
2010-10-07 01:01 <pheller> cedk: ah, ok. no problem | ||
2010-10-07 01:01 <pheller> cedk: are there many more patches to apply before testing should begin? | ||
2010-10-07 01:02 <cedk> pheller: no except one fix for documentation | ||
2010-10-07 01:02 <pheller> cedk: ok, I started testing a little -- found some things already :-) | ||
2010-10-07 01:02 <pheller> cedk: try opening UOM tree | ||
2010-10-07 01:03 <cedk> pheller: report in roundup | ||
2010-10-07 01:03 <pheller> will do | ||
2010-10-07 01:03 <cedk> I'm going to sleep now | ||
2010-10-07 01:03 <pheller> good night | ||
2010-10-07 01:04 <pheller> oh, and thank you for allowing me to contribute. I tried to contribute to oerp, but they never want my patches, I guess. | ||
2010-10-07 01:04 <pheller> so thanks! talk to you later | ||
2010-10-07 01:59 -!- rednul_(~rednul@host-174-45-250-246.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 02:10 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.250.229) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 03:01 -!- pheller(~pheller@2002:ad30:d8c3:0:217:f2ff:fe04:afe) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 03:12 -!- pheller(~pheller@2002:ad30:d8c3:0:217:f2ff:fe04:afe) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 04:15 -!- ikks(~ikks@190.158.103.55) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 05:18 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F6E4A.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 05:59 -!- tekoholix(~quassel@184-96-0-28.hlrn.qwest.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 06:07 -!- gremly(~gremly@190.26.155.61) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 07:00 -!- Timitos(~kp@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 07:23 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@adsl-dyn29.78-99-116.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 07:54 <Timitos> cedk: hi. i am writing the patch for 0 value move lines | ||
2010-10-07 07:54 <Timitos> cedk: it would be great if i also could do this for a 0 value on unit_price | ||
2010-10-07 07:55 <Timitos> it would be easy to override the required state on unit_price in invoice_line if needed | ||
2010-10-07 07:55 <Timitos> we have some cases where this would be good like 'buy 4 get 5' offers for example | ||
2010-10-07 07:56 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 07:57 <cedk> Timitos: unit_price and quantity are required so they can not be 0 | ||
2010-10-07 07:58 <Timitos> cedk: yes. because of this state on unit_price http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_invoice/file/2e4ab5d098d0/invoice.py#l1271 | ||
2010-10-07 07:59 <Timitos> cedk: but if somebody needs it he can override the state | ||
2010-10-07 07:59 <cedk> Timitos: so he will do what he wants for this kind of line | ||
2010-10-07 07:59 <Timitos> cedk: it would be easy to this if i add the 0 value handling also for this cases | ||
2010-10-07 08:00 <cedk> Timitos: but it makes no sense | ||
2010-10-07 08:00 <Timitos> cedk: why? | ||
2010-10-07 08:01 <Timitos> cedk: for example how will you handle a delivery with some extra gift? it is common to have this on the invoice without a price | ||
2010-10-07 08:01 <cedk> Timitos: you can not invoice somthing that has no value | ||
2010-10-07 08:02 <Timitos> cedk: on the invoice there should be all activities that are a profit for the customer. even if they have no price | ||
2010-10-07 08:03 <cedk> Timitos: it is not an invoice line | ||
2010-10-07 08:03 <Timitos> cedk: so you would create another line type i think | ||
2010-10-07 08:03 <cedk> Timitos: I never see this on an invoice | ||
2010-10-07 08:06 <Timitos> cedk: i already found invoices from 2 companies in my own ones | ||
2010-10-07 08:07 <Timitos> 3rd one | ||
2010-10-07 08:10 -!- eLBati(~elbati@94.161.92.70) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 08:14 <Timitos> cedk: that you did not see invoices like that does not mean that they cannot exist. i really think that we should provide an easy way to use this. | ||
2010-10-07 08:14 <cedk> Timitos: I don't think it is a good way to implement this because you can not sale at lost | ||
2010-10-07 08:15 <Timitos> cedk: but for the customer it is a profit. why shouldn´t a supplier inform a customer about a profit on the invoice even if he does not need to pay for it? | ||
2010-10-07 08:20 <udono> Timitos: not only this, the supplier must demonstrate the financial tax authorities, that he give away products for free, which he bought himself. And the only official document is the invoice for showing this. | ||
2010-10-07 08:20 <Timitos> cedk: and even if it does not cost anything for the customer the supplier needs to do a stock move. so it is the same handling on stock but with no price. i do not see a difference in the process | ||
2010-10-07 08:29 <cedk> udono: I don't understand your "official document", if there is no accounting move for it, it doesn't exist | ||
2010-10-07 08:29 <cedk> udono: invoice is not The official docuement, it is the general ledger | ||
2010-10-07 08:30 <cedk> Timitos: for me most of the time, it is no a sale at 0 but indeed you sale every thing at lower price | ||
2010-10-07 08:30 <cedk> Timitos: like you said 5 for the price of 4 | ||
2010-10-07 08:36 -!- mfladischer(~fladische@2001:470:1f0b:11df:143c:98ff:fe88:f1b3) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 09:07 -!- ecarreras(~under@81.184.3.75.static.user.ono.com) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 09:07 -!- ecarreras(~under@unaffiliated/ecarreras) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 09:26 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 09:31 <cedk> Timitos, udono: we should put this discussion on tryton mailing list | ||
2010-10-07 09:32 <Timitos> cedk: i agree. i am just searching for some more input | ||
2010-10-07 09:32 <Timitos> cedk: i will do my patch without this and start another thread | ||
2010-10-07 09:35 <cedk> Timitos: it should go on tryton and not tryton-dev | ||
2010-10-07 09:36 <cedk> Timitos: because it is a business question | ||
2010-10-07 09:37 <Timitos> cedk: ok. what about a patch resulting from such a business question. should i start a new thread on tryton-dev then with a link to the thread related to the business question? | ||
2010-10-07 09:42 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB16EB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 09:42 <cedk> Timitos: it will go on codereview and then forward the codereview notification on tryton-dev | ||
2010-10-07 09:42 <Timitos> cedk: ok | ||
2010-10-07 09:44 <Timitos> cedk: you said not to put the tryton-dev mailinglist on cc in codereview. but how do you send these notification to tryton-dev. do you remove tryton-dev from codereview after using upload.py? just wonder about your way how you manage this | ||
2010-10-07 09:46 <cedk> Timitos: I forward the email that I receive from codereview | ||
2010-10-07 09:46 <Timitos> cedk: ok. thx | ||
2010-10-07 09:57 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 10:20 -!- bechamel(~user@chimie-prtx11.scf.fundp.ac.be) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 10:37 -!- Red15(~red15@unaffiliated/red15) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 11:04 -!- gavinf(~gavinf@196-210-199-66.dynamic.isadsl.co.za) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 11:43 -!- Gerald_E(~quassel@ip-240-3.pel.cz) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 13:42 <cedk> yangoon: could you test now ncloning neso? | ||
2010-10-07 14:09 <yangoon> cedk works now until [neso/trytond/trytond/modules/account] | ||
2010-10-07 14:09 <yangoon> cedk: then same error | ||
2010-10-07 14:11 <yangoon> I had also another issue with hg npull: it stops working if encountering modules from not hgnested-enabled servers | ||
2010-10-07 14:36 <cedk> yangoon: and now? | ||
2010-10-07 14:39 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB217F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 14:39 <yangoon> cedk: still same problem | ||
2010-10-07 14:40 <yangoon> cedk: stops at modules | ||
2010-10-07 14:43 <cedk> yangoon: and now? | ||
2010-10-07 14:45 <yangoon> cedk: works now | ||
2010-10-07 14:51 <yangoon> cedk: has successfully completed, thx | ||
2010-10-07 15:06 <cedk> yangoon: could you test one more time? | ||
2010-10-07 15:22 -!- woakas(~woakas@pcsp163-59.supercabletv.net.co) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 16:24 -!- gremly(~gremly@200.106.202.91) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 16:27 <yangoon> cedk: still works | ||
2010-10-07 16:29 <cedk> yangoon: ok thx | ||
2010-10-07 16:34 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 19:00 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 19:03 -!- pheller(~pheller@c1fw235.constantcontact.com) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 20:15 -!- eLBati(~elbati@94.162.96.110) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 20:17 -!- plantian(~ian@c-69-181-194-95.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 20:22 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB217F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has left #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 20:53 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB7DAC.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 22:03 -!- gremly_(~gremly@200.106.202.91) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 22:09 -!- dba(~daniel@static.88-198-196-34.clients.your-server.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 22:10 -!- udono(~udono@dynamic-unidsl-85-197-25-103.westend.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 22:10 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 23:20 -!- heg(~heg@dyn.144-85-137-217.dsl.vtx.ch) has joined #tryton | ||
2010-10-07 23:33 -!- pheller(~pheller@pool-173-48-216-195.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!