| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Feb 19 00:00:01 CET 2009 | ||
| 2009-02-19 00:00 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #796/AttributeError: 'Screen' object has no attribute 'views': [need-eg] Could you describe step by step what you do? And give which version do you use? | ||
| 2009-02-19 00:17 -!- paola_(n=paola@host-84-223-76-210.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 01:53 -!- igor__(i=igor@190.102.210.135) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 05:20 -!- yangoon(n=mathiasb@p549F5FCB.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 06:34 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 07:19 -!- sharkcz(n=dan@plz1-v-4-17.static.adsl.vol.cz) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 07:40 -!- Timitos(n=Timitos@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 08:06 -!- Gedd(n=ged@77.109.113.158) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 08:11 -!- carlos(n=carlos@89.7.24.44) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 08:30 -!- paola(n=paola@host-84-223-76-210.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 08:40 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 09:23 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 09:35 -!- simahawk(n=simao@adsl-ull-80-21.50-151.net24.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 09:35 -!- simahawk(n=simao@adsl-ull-80-21.50-151.net24.it) has left #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 10:00 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 10:00 -!- cedric_b_(n=cedric@ANantes-158-1-152-186.w90-59.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 10:19 -!- tekknokrat(n=gthieleb@port-87-193-170-219.static.qsc.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 10:32 -!- cedric_b__(n=cedric@ANantes-158-1-115-91.w90-49.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:03 -!- cedric_b_(n=cedric@ANantes-158-1-94-244.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:05 <CIA-10> tryton: Mathias Behrle <mathiasb@behrle.dyndns.org> default * 273:7bc5e5bb2bbb website/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/tryton.po: Update translation for de_DE | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:18 -!- cedric_b(n=cedric@ANantes-158-1-94-244.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:20 <yangoon> bechamel: did you do the zazzle shop? | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:21 <bechamel> yangoon: yes | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:21 <yangoon> gr8 | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:21 <yangoon> but for the logo size on the shirt I am prefering http://www.cafepress.com/tryton.336255980 | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:22 <yangoon> bechamel: can you change it? | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:23 <bechamel> yangoon: zazzle allow to tweak the layout iirc | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:25 <yangoon> bechamel: yes, correct | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:32 <bechamel> yangoon: but you are right, the shirt is nicer with a bigger logo | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:33 <yangoon> bechamel: it seems to be possible to save different templates | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:35 <bechamel> yangoon: yes, i choose zazzle over cafepress because with cafepress you have to pay to provide several designs for the same item (dark shirt in this case) | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:55 <udono> bechamel: how long did it take to order a t-shirt? | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:56 <bechamel> udono: i don't know, i didn't try yet | ||
| 2009-02-19 11:57 <bechamel> udono: btw there is also a zazzle.co.uk | ||
| 2009-02-19 12:15 <CIA-10> tryton: cedric.krier@b2ck.com * r437 /wiki/Release_1_2_0.wiki: Edited wiki page through web user interface. | ||
| 2009-02-19 12:15 <CIA-10> tryton: cedric.krier@b2ck.com * r438 /wiki/Release_1_2_0.wiki: Edited wiki page through web user interface. | ||
| 2009-02-19 13:03 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 1349:878535a1d4d0 trytond/trytond/osv/orm.py: Fix add_null in SQL query for issue795 | ||
| 2009-02-19 13:17 -!- paola_(n=paola@host-84-223-76-210.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 13:59 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 1559:d867cda68b93 trytond/trytond/ir/action.py: Use os separator in filename when calling file_open | ||
| 2009-02-19 13:59 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 1560:62295fcc7e35 trytond/trytond/report/report.py: Clause temporary file before remove it | ||
| 2009-02-19 14:12 -!- ikks(i=igor@190.102.216.122) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 14:42 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 14:47 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 1350:b554778ad371 trytond/trytond/ir/action.py: Use os separator in filename when calling file_open | ||
| 2009-02-19 14:47 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 1351:ae365a338610 trytond/trytond/report/report.py: Clause temporary file before remove it | ||
| 2009-02-19 15:10 -!- saxa(n=sasa@host242-95-static.223-217-b.business.telecomitalia.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 16:00 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-81-197.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 16:13 <udono> bechamel: the t-shirts seems not to work with white color on black ground: http://zazzle.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/zazzle.cfg/php/enduser/popup_adp.php?p_faqid=165&p_sid=yR6wTSqj&p_lva=&p_li=undefined&p_sp=undefined | ||
| 2009-02-19 16:14 <udono> bechamel: "Please note that for designing on all styles aside from Zazzle Basic Dark T-shirts, white areas will not be printed regardless of image format." | ||
| 2009-02-19 16:23 <bechamel> udono: the png containing the logo is a png with transparency | ||
| 2009-02-19 16:23 <bechamel> udono: white color is considered as transparent for non-dark shirts | ||
| 2009-02-19 17:59 -!- juanfer(n=juanfer@190.144.69.234) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:08 <Timitos> cedk: in account_invoice there are some lines in on_change_product() to retrieve the unit_price. wouldn´t it be better to have one function on product.template or product.product an pass all the necessary parameters to it link (quantity, product, uom, company.currency, _invoice.currency and price type (purchase, sale,...)? same for sale and purchase? | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:09 <Timitos> this way it would be easier to adapt price calculation with custom modules | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:27 <cedk> Timitos: I don't know because it will be any way module specific | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:29 <cedk> Timitos: for the invoice, this unit_price is realy an approximative value | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:30 <cedk> Timitos: and invoice must not be used to make sale or purchase | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:31 <Timitos> cedk: i do not understand. why is unit_price for invoice approximative? | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:31 <cedk> Timitos: because it doesn't care about any kind of price list | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:32 <cedk> Timitos: it takes cost_price or list_price | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:32 <Timitos> cedk: for me price computation in sale, purchase and invoice is quite similar. so if i create one function get_price on product.product or product.template i could use this function for all three modules. | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:32 <Timitos> cedk: sale does the same. it takes list_price for the moment | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:33 <cedk> Timitos: yes perhaps | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:34 <Timitos> cedk: and i also would develop pricelist for invoice. because it is not good if there cannot be used pricelist their. like this it is in openerp and i don´t like that | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:34 <Timitos> cedk: i do not see any reason why pricelist should not be used on invoice | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:35 <cedk> Timitos: so ok, you could work on it and provide a patch | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:35 <Timitos> cedk: ok. i will provide pathes for account_invoice, sale and purchase | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:36 <cedk> Timitos: fill an issue in roundup to share the work | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:36 <Timitos> cedk: ok | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:42 -!- paola(n=paola@host-84-223-76-210.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:53 -!- X0d_of_N0d(n=user@69-12-128-129.dsl.static.sonic.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 18:54 <X0d_of_N0d> ACTION waves @ udono | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:04 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: hey man | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:05 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: nice to read you! | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:06 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: back @ ya man | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:07 <X0d_of_N0d> man, have you ever used a Kinesis kbd? It's like I'm relearning to type.... | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:07 <X0d_of_N0d> so what were you wondering? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:08 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: what is a kinesis kbd? never heared/used | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:09 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Iam on planning how to realise a clean ldap auth | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:10 <X0d_of_N0d> http://www.kinesis-ergo.com/ < a friend got one and didn't like it so I'm trying it | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:11 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: ldap auth should be done the same way all other ldap stuff... | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:11 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: huh, so you are writing on a broken kbd :-) | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:12 <X0d_of_N0d> not broken... just really strange. | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:12 <X0d_of_N0d> heh | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:12 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, is there a standard way for ldap auth? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:12 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: I think of: | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:12 <udono> 1. anon bind | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:12 <udono> 2. check if user exists | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:13 <udono> 2.1 If user not exist: auth fail | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:13 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: no...not really | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:13 <udono> 2.2 is user(name) exist: auth bind with password | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:14 <udono> 3. if auth bind nok: auth fails | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:14 <X0d_of_N0d> the standard way to bind is to bind as user... so simple_bind_s(user,passwd) | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:14 <X0d_of_N0d> if | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:14 <X0d_of_N0d> if that fails then auth failes | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:14 <udono> 4. if auth bind ok: auth ok | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:15 <X0d_of_N0d> you never need to check for a user because auth bind does that for you | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:15 -!- kleinerdrache(n=mn@91-115-225-250.adsl.highway.telekom.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:15 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: ok, understand | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:15 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: how to combine with ldap_base? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:16 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: there we have resources/server | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:18 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: if we make directly simple_bind_s(user,passwd) we need there in server definition an auth bind, with password too? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:18 <X0d_of_N0d> no you'd bind with the passwd supplied by the user... if the ldap setting for user bind is used that is | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:19 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: so ldap_auth doesn't need ldap_base? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:19 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: srry, wrong | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:20 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: don't understand: "if the ldap setting for user bind is used that is" | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:21 <X0d_of_N0d> the user is filter+": "+username+ldap_base | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:22 <X0d_of_N0d> erm... s/:/=/ | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:23 <X0d_of_N0d> e.g.: uid=joe,dc=company | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:25 <X0d_of_N0d> so iirc the call would be l.simple_bind_s('uid=joe,dc=company','passwd') | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:26 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: ah, ok, understand | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:27 <X0d_of_N0d> but this is all only if the user's server is newer than 5 years or so, or configured correctly... | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:27 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: so I put on res_user a link to a ldap_resource? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:28 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: and vice versa | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:28 <X0d_of_N0d> hold on, lemme look at the code | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:28 -!- vengfulsquirrel(n=ian@c-71-202-125-182.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:38 <X0d_of_N0d> we need to override the orm for res_user so that queries for users search ldap | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:38 <X0d_of_N0d> this isn't needed for auth, but for looking at or adding users it would be | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:39 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:40 <X0d_of_N0d> which was the next thing I was going to work on before I got pulled away to do a bunch of other stuff here at work | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:40 <X0d_of_N0d> ACTION grumbles | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:41 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: ...but just for ldap_auth: are res_user m2o ldap_base combined? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:41 <X0d_of_N0d> basically we need to implment that in the base ldap module | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:42 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: the res_user m2o ldap_base ? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:42 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: it can be inherited from ldap_auth. So you can use ldap_base without ldap_auth | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:43 <X0d_of_N0d> hold up for a sec | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:43 <udono> ACTION thinks that somone only likes to use ldap for an addressbook, but not for auth. | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:43 <X0d_of_N0d> res_user would be seperate from ldap base, yes | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:44 <X0d_of_N0d> ldap_auth would override res_user | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:47 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:48 <X0d_of_N0d> man, this kb is really making it hard to move around, sorry it's taking so long | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:48 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: but you have the double size ESC key? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:49 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: and keys for copy, cut and paste :-) | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:49 <X0d_of_N0d> I almost never use esc, I use emacs | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:50 <X0d_of_N0d> and now ctrl is under my thumb instead of my pinkey | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:51 <X0d_of_N0d> this is kind of interesting | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:52 <X0d_of_N0d> User already has it's own methods for create write and read | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:52 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: one last question. Which should be the behavoir when ldap auth fails. Should there be a fallback to tryton standard authentication mechanism? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:52 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: or should this be customizable via a checkbox? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:52 <cedk> udono: by the way, you should ask to intuxication guys to put your ldap modules under tryton category | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:53 <udono> cedk: yes, I will do so. thanks | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:53 <cedk> udono: I was just searching the modules and it was a little difficult :-) | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:54 <udono> cedk: I will just wait if they are tested and debugged a bit more. | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:54 <udono> cedk: I give you the links: | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:54 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: using nsswitch as a model we should fail back to tryton db if ldap fails, but only if ldap fails | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:55 <udono> cedk: http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/ldap_auth is not working for now | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:56 <udono> cedk: http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/ldap_base is ok, but there is still the translation issue open for the error messages. | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:56 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: ldap fails means no connection to the ldap server? | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:56 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: and not authentication on ldap fails | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:58 <X0d_of_N0d> no, it means that auth fails against ldap | ||
| 2009-02-19 19:58 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: ok | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:01 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: hey man, btw, sorry I'm not more involved in this | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:05 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: no problem, I think I can handle the ldap_auth stuff. The orm part I don't know enough for now. Maybe later you find some time to specify your Ideas for this in the wiki. | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:06 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: i can give you veague idea... | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:07 <X0d_of_N0d> I'll try to add stuff to the wiki though | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:08 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Yeah, an idea even a veague is very welcome. | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:08 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Thanks a lot! | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:08 -!- cristi_an(i=5978d3ce@gateway/web/ajax/mibbit.com/x-228700daacd2feed) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:09 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: take a look at res/user.py | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:09 <cristi_an> when i create a custom module all code is written on server side in the module...nothing on client side ? | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:10 <X0d_of_N0d> cristi_an: afaik | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:10 <X0d_of_N0d> cristi_an: yes | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:10 <cristi_an> just wnated to be sure,about this | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:11 <cristi_an> cause for simple moudles i have done...ithis was the case | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:11 <cristi_an> and client acted like a browser | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:11 <cristi_an> wonder if i want to change how a control react on a key .. | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:12 <cristi_an> fopress | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:13 <X0d_of_N0d> cristi_an: i belive user configuration is stored in the db, if you're talking about adding a hot key to a form or something I don't know | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:15 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: so the User class inherits OSV then modifies the create, write, delete, etc.. methods of OSV | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:15 -!- vengfulsquirrel(n=ian@c-71-202-125-182.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:16 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: likewise an ldap_OSV would override read, write, create, etc in order to query ldap instead of postgres | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:17 <X0d_of_N0d> then ldap_user would inherit ldap_OSV, and everything else should be (more or less) transparent | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:18 <X0d_of_N0d> vengfulsquirrel: how are things going in your neck of the woods man? sorry I've been so out of the loop, my boss pulled me off tryton stuff to work on our ecr system | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:20 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: but be carefull about the transaction | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:20 <X0d_of_N0d> ACTION looks at cedk | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:21 <cedk> if you update stuff outside the cursor transaction, in case of exception the change will not be rollbacked | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:22 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: for this I suggest to keep the write, create, etc... into the database and add also write, create, ... on the ldap server | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:22 <vengfulsquirrel> X0d_of_N0d: Yeah I have been kind of distracted with extending Tryton to work with my company minus production. I barely started the base production module and it still needs a lot of work. I'm going to start working on it some more today though. http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/production/file/ef69fd6a69fa/production.py | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:24 <X0d_of_N0d> cedk: I'd rather handle this all in ldap, replicated data can lead to difficult to diagnose bugs and security problems | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:25 <X0d_of_N0d> vengfulsquirrel: cool, it looks like I'll be stuck on this stuff for at least the next week or so. | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:26 <X0d_of_N0d> cedk: if ldap can't commit a transaction it raises an error, as long as we don't do bulk transactions or try to update more than one DN at a time then ldap should take care of the rollback issue | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:26 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: yes, use only the data from ldap but I suggest to still perform the operation on database to care of the transaction and the constraint | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:27 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: any way, you need an entry in res_user table for each user because there is a foreign key on every table that point to res_user | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:27 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: write_uid and create_uid | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:28 <X0d_of_N0d> cedk: hum.... | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:29 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: it is not an issue if you override each function and put the data from ldap | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:31 <X0d_of_N0d> are there any constraints on other tables that checks if the wirte and create uids exist in the db? | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:31 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: perhaps, any module could add it | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:32 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: bbl | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:33 <X0d_of_N0d> cedk: if it's not there it's better, thanks | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:45 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: cedk another way could be something like handshake communication: catch the read, write, change and direct it to ldap. After this read the results from ldap, check them if they are equal with the sended data and after this read, write, change the tryton data. | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:46 <X0d_of_N0d> ldap does all this | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:46 <X0d_of_N0d> ldap will tell you if the write failed and why | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:46 <X0d_of_N0d> you just need to check the return value for the write | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:50 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: so if you tried to add a user and all the fields were right, but the telephone number was invalid then nothing would be committed until all information was correct | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:55 <cedk> X0d_of_N0d: this is not enough for the transaction | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:56 <cedk> I think the best it to do the same on both side database and ldap | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:56 <cedk> the transaction could fail later | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:57 <cedk> but of course the ldap data will not be rollbacked | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:57 -!- tekknokrat(n=gthieleb@port-87-193-170-219.static.qsc.de) has left #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:58 <cedk> there is no good solution since we duplicate the transaction system | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:58 <cedk> so you need one master, and I think it must be the data in database | ||
| 2009-02-19 20:58 <cedk> as it is part of the all | ||
| 2009-02-19 21:05 <X0d_of_N0d> how could the transaction fail later? | ||
| 2009-02-19 21:14 <X0d_of_N0d> I don't quite understand | ||
| 2009-02-19 21:35 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-81-197.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 22:04 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: good night, see you. | ||
| 2009-02-19 22:11 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: later man | ||
| 2009-02-19 22:31 -!- ikks_(n=igor@190.144.69.234) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 23:11 -!- tekknokrat(n=gthieleb@dslb-088-074-183-142.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 23:19 -!- ikks_(n=igor@190.144.69.234) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2009-02-19 23:29 -!- vengfulsquirrel(n=ian@c-71-202-125-182.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!