chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Sat Feb 7 00:00:01 CET 2009 | ||
2009-02-07 00:08 <vengfulsquirrel> Is there a way to use products_by_location to get a summarized count of a list of products at a warehoues? Like a stock check ? Or is it best to get a list of all product id/location id pairs and add them manually ? | ||
2009-02-07 00:20 <vengfulsquirrel> nevermind, ackk, I was passing a flag in context instead of directly | ||
2009-02-07 01:14 -!- yangoon(n=mathiasb@p549F47ED.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 02:21 -!- gremly(n=oscar@190.157.165.111) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 02:26 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: hi | ||
2009-02-07 02:26 <vengfulsquirrel> yangoon: hey | ||
2009-02-07 02:27 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: I would appreciate a lot, if you could some comment to http://groups.google.com/group/tryton/browse_thread/thread/8337c7319c2efaaa | ||
2009-02-07 02:28 <yangoon> s/could/could post/ | ||
2009-02-07 02:30 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: I would like to hear the experience of native english speakers with the overall appearence of the app, especially informational or error messages. | ||
2009-02-07 02:31 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: I have the impression, there could be done some refinement. | ||
2009-02-07 02:34 <vengfulsquirrel> Yeah ha I never prided myself on my ability to speak English but there are some irregularities here and there in the app. | ||
2009-02-07 02:35 <vengfulsquirrel> Are you introducing Pick List, Pack List and Delivery Note as alternatives or just as examples of "Packings" ? | ||
2009-02-07 02:36 <yangoon> those are documents needed for different purposes | ||
2009-02-07 02:36 <vengfulsquirrel> Oh wait maybe that's this line: "The current usage of Packing List in Tryton uses and serves a part of all purposes resp. documents without serving one completely." | ||
2009-02-07 02:36 <yangoon> and I think we have to decide, which one shall be the current packing list | ||
2009-02-07 02:37 <yangoon> yes, exactl | ||
2009-02-07 02:37 <yangoon> y | ||
2009-02-07 02:38 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: what do you think in general about the term "packing"? | ||
2009-02-07 02:39 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: is it a current term for what it is used in tryton? | ||
2009-02-07 02:39 <vengfulsquirrel> Yeah I have to review it but I want to say that the word packing itself isn't bad to refer to the entire group of things but that better words could be used to describe how they are used in each case. | ||
2009-02-07 02:39 <yangoon> ok | ||
2009-02-07 02:43 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: so thx for your input, have to sleep now, bye | ||
2009-02-07 02:43 <vengfulsquirrel> yangoon: oh yeah I'll post something this weekend after I read more about it | ||
2009-02-07 02:43 <vengfulsquirrel> and maybe talk to you tomorrow about it, gn | ||
2009-02-07 02:44 <yangoon> vengfulsquirrel: yes, thx a lot, cu | ||
2009-02-07 03:55 -!- ikks(i=igor@190.102.216.93) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 05:19 -!- yangoon(n=mathiasb@p549F666B.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 08:21 -!- carlos(n=carlos@89.7.24.44) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 08:49 -!- sharkcz(n=dan@plz1-v-4-17.static.adsl.vol.cz) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 09:54 -!- paola(n=paola@host-84-223-76-210.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 11:07 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-89-221.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 12:20 -!- johbo(n=joh@statdsl-085-016-072-173.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 13:09 -!- johbo(n=joh@statdsl-085-016-072-173.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 13:17 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-89-221.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 13:56 -!- cristi_an(i=5978d3ce@gateway/web/ajax/mibbit.com/x-3b79db150db88311) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 13:57 <cristi_an> Timitos: do you now id the stock module | ||
2009-02-07 13:57 <cristi_an> permits to see the stocks at any date in the past | ||
2009-02-07 13:58 <cristi_an> asume if i want to see how the stock looked like 2 weeks ago | ||
2009-02-07 13:58 <cristi_an> and all movements that a product has in a period of time | ||
2009-02-07 13:59 <cristi_an> or udono if you knoe this, anyone who know is welcome to answer | ||
2009-02-07 14:20 <Timitos> cristi_an: yes you can see the stock at any date in the past | ||
2009-02-07 14:20 <cristi_an> nice ! | ||
2009-02-07 14:21 <cristi_an> for all products ? or i have to choose one to see the quantitiy it had | ||
2009-02-07 14:21 <cristi_an> that time | ||
2009-02-07 14:22 <Timitos> cristi_an: but i am not sure about the movements for a specific period. but i think this should be possible too. but perhaps for this a customization is possible | ||
2009-02-07 14:23 <Timitos> cristi_an: you can test this on demo. if you click on locations in inventory management and then click on a location. there you can define the date. all products that have a stock value for this location will be displayed then | ||
2009-02-07 14:24 <cristi_an> k. | ||
2009-02-07 14:24 <cristi_an> i will do that | ||
2009-02-07 15:33 -!- udono(n=udono@dynamic-unidsl-85-197-23-64.westend.de) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 15:41 <johbo> doest anybody know if there is some documentation or an example out there on the net how to customize / replace invoice.odt or other template in "the right way"? | ||
2009-02-07 16:13 <carlos> johbo: I don't think so | ||
2009-02-07 16:13 <carlos> however, I talked with cedk about it two days ago | ||
2009-02-07 16:13 <carlos> johbo: http://www.tryton.org/~irclog/2009-02-05.log.html#t2009-02-05_23:07 | ||
2009-02-07 16:15 <johbo> carlos: thanks for the link :-) | ||
2009-02-07 16:16 <carlos> you are welcome | ||
2009-02-07 16:16 <johbo> I am doing my fist experiments with the templates now by simply overriding them | ||
2009-02-07 16:18 <carlos> I didn't try it yet, but I saw the upload form | ||
2009-02-07 16:18 <carlos> so it should work :-P | ||
2009-02-07 16:19 <johbo> yes, i found it - will try it later | ||
2009-02-07 17:30 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-89-221.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 19:41 <carlos> Timitos: hi, are you around? | ||
2009-02-07 19:41 <Timitos> carlos: hi | ||
2009-02-07 19:41 <carlos> Timitos: hi, I'm 'fighting' with taxes and I wonder whether you know anything to cover a special case we have in Spain | ||
2009-02-07 19:42 <carlos> we have a tax that is only paid by some people that is a surcharge of the regular vat tax | ||
2009-02-07 19:43 <carlos> so in general, such customer tells me that he's supposed to pay such tax and all the invoices should have regular vat + an extra tax | ||
2009-02-07 19:44 <carlos> the extra tax depends on the percentage of VAT applied to the product | ||
2009-02-07 19:45 <Timitos> carlos: so the tax is computed as a percentage of the vat tax amount, right? | ||
2009-02-07 19:45 <carlos> not exactly | ||
2009-02-07 19:46 <carlos> 4% of vat is 0,5% extra | ||
2009-02-07 19:46 <carlos> 7% of vat is 1% extra | ||
2009-02-07 19:46 <carlos> and 16% of vat is 4% extra | ||
2009-02-07 19:46 <carlos> I guess you could represent it as a computed percentage... | ||
2009-02-07 19:48 <carlos> hmm... but the percentage is going to be different for each vat entry, so, no, it's not a computed percentage of the vat amount | ||
2009-02-07 19:48 <Timitos> carlos: it could be done with child taxes i think. but there is for special cases a problem | ||
2009-02-07 19:49 <carlos> so I should create an account.tax.template child | ||
2009-02-07 19:49 <carlos> ? | ||
2009-02-07 19:49 <Timitos> yes | ||
2009-02-07 19:49 <carlos> but how do I select when it's used or not? | ||
2009-02-07 19:49 <Timitos> carlos: i donĀ“t know where to start to explain. the topic is complex :-) | ||
2009-02-07 19:50 <Timitos> carlos: this is one the problems. you cannot | ||
2009-02-07 19:50 <Timitos> you cannot select whether the child should be used or not | ||
2009-02-07 19:50 <carlos> I expect some code development involved | ||
2009-02-07 19:51 <carlos> Timitos: so if I have an account.tax.template and apply it to a product | ||
2009-02-07 19:51 <Timitos> carlos: but this problem is a base problem with the way how taxes are selected for invoices | ||
2009-02-07 19:51 <carlos> all its children will be applied too? | ||
2009-02-07 19:51 <Timitos> carlos: yes. right | ||
2009-02-07 19:51 <carlos> ok, that's a good start point | ||
2009-02-07 19:51 <Timitos> we have also cases in germany where the way to select the taxes in tryton is not very good. | ||
2009-02-07 19:52 <carlos> Timitos: thanks, I'm going to investigate a bit more the code to see whether I see an easy way to implement this use case | ||
2009-02-07 19:52 <Timitos> carlos: i am thinking of a solution for this for a long time | ||
2009-02-07 19:52 <carlos> but is it also related with the party involved? | ||
2009-02-07 19:52 <carlos> like the case I just explained | ||
2009-02-07 19:52 <Timitos> i startet to create a prototype. its ugly code, but for testing it is working | ||
2009-02-07 19:53 <carlos> Timitos: any code is welcomed, I could help improving it | ||
2009-02-07 19:53 <carlos> at least trying to improve it :-P | ||
2009-02-07 19:53 <Timitos> carlos: look at http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/account_tax_system_de | ||
2009-02-07 19:54 <Timitos> carlos: it really needs improvement as i had not enough time to make it the right way. it was rapid prototyping | ||
2009-02-07 19:54 <Timitos> carlos: i am not sure if it is working with dev-version in the moment | ||
2009-02-07 19:54 <carlos> don't worry I will not blame you for that :-P | ||
2009-02-07 19:54 <Timitos> :-) | ||
2009-02-07 19:54 <carlos> I'm still working with the stable version | ||
2009-02-07 19:54 <carlos> so that shouldn't be a problem | ||
2009-02-07 19:55 <Timitos> i tried to create a module that can select taxes by complex queries. like a firewall | ||
2009-02-07 19:55 <Timitos> it should take the first entry which matches the case | ||
2009-02-07 19:57 <Timitos> carlos: it was an approach to create a module that can handle european vat law | ||
2009-02-07 19:57 <carlos> so you are also trying to solve another problem I didn't start to look at, the intrastat selling/buying with UE VAT numbers... | ||
2009-02-07 19:57 <carlos> yeah | ||
2009-02-07 19:57 <carlos> I just saw that | ||
2009-02-07 19:59 <carlos> Timitos: I'm not sure whether that's the approach you are taking, but I see this problem just like a pricelist per party but for taxes | ||
2009-02-07 20:00 <Timitos> carlos: something like this. yes. but its more complex as taxes selection dependes on many attributes of the individual case. | ||
2009-02-07 20:01 <Timitos> like: in which country is the customer, in which country is the company, where starts the delivery, where ends the delivery and so on.... | ||
2009-02-07 20:11 <carlos> Timitos: do you mean that you want to support Customs taxes too? | ||
2009-02-07 20:11 <Timitos> carlos: what do you mean with customs taxes? | ||
2009-02-07 20:11 <carlos> or is just that vat is different in Germany depending on the country where it's delievered? (outside the intra-states vat) | ||
2009-02-07 20:12 <carlos> Timitos: for instance, the taxes you pay for importing a good from China, Japan, USA, etc... | ||
2009-02-07 20:13 <Timitos> carlos: yes. i think it is possible to handle other taxes with this solution too. but this needs a good concept. i had only some ideas for now. | ||
2009-02-07 20:13 <carlos> yeah, cover all thoses cases would be quite complicate | ||
2009-02-07 20:14 <carlos> at least in Spain, you don't know the tax until you get the goods | ||
2009-02-07 20:14 <carlos> it depends on who reviews it | ||
2009-02-07 20:15 <Timitos> carlos: something like this is already possible with my approach. | ||
2009-02-07 20:15 <Timitos> carlos: there is another advantage: you can set a tax account for every case | ||
2009-02-07 20:16 <carlos> did you discuss this with the b2ck guys? | ||
2009-02-07 20:16 <carlos> getting something like that ready for 1.2 would be wonderful | ||
2009-02-07 20:18 <Timitos> carlos: yes. they are interested in this topic. but it is not planned for 1.2. there is not enough time for that. but i hope it will come before 1.4 which is planned for autumn this year | ||
2009-02-07 20:19 <carlos> hmm, well, in the mean time, I guess we could live with a workaround | ||
2009-02-07 20:19 <Timitos> carlos: but you are not the only one wishing this solution. yangoon is waiting for this too. so i will try to develop this soon. | ||
2009-02-07 20:20 <Timitos> carlos: if you take a look at the tax_system module and give me some feedback it would be helpful | ||
2009-02-07 20:22 <carlos> count with that | ||
2009-02-07 20:23 <Timitos> great | ||
2009-02-07 20:24 <carlos> we should integrate that code with the UE website to validate valid UE vat numbers | ||
2009-02-07 20:25 <carlos> that would rock | ||
2009-02-07 20:27 <carlos> Timitos: so you have limits on deliveries ? | ||
2009-02-07 20:27 <carlos> ACTION talks about del_threshold | ||
2009-02-07 20:28 <Timitos> carlos: this is a special case of european vat law. if somebody sells more than 2 million eur in a specific country in europe it has to pay vat in this specific country in special cases. | ||
2009-02-07 20:29 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 20:29 <carlos> Timitos: oh, I didn't know that | ||
2009-02-07 20:29 <carlos> cedk: hey! how's FOSDEM? | ||
2009-02-07 20:40 <Timitos> afk | ||
2009-02-07 20:40 <cedk> carlos: very well | ||
2009-02-07 20:40 <cedk> carlos: we see the postgres talks | ||
2009-02-07 20:41 <cedk> postgres begin to be very great | ||
2009-02-07 20:41 <carlos> ACTION always loved postgres | ||
2009-02-07 20:41 <carlos> nice | ||
2009-02-07 20:41 <cedk> carlos: it was about replication | ||
2009-02-07 20:41 <cedk> it will be in the next release | ||
2009-02-07 20:42 <cedk> and the function will be better than what there is in Oracle | ||
2009-02-07 20:42 <carlos> yeah, I read about the 8.4 replication capabilities | ||
2009-02-07 20:48 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 21:00 -!- paola(n=paola@host-84-223-76-210.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 21:01 -!- fe(n=fe@213-140-6-127.ip.fastwebnet.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 22:07 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-89-221.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 22:30 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 23:04 -!- vengfulsquirrel(n=ian@c-71-202-125-182.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 23:04 -!- vengfulsquirrel(n=ian@c-71-202-125-182.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has left #tryton | ||
2009-02-07 23:11 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has left #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!