| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Mon Dec 29 00:00:01 CET 2008 | ||
| 2008-12-29 01:15 <CIA-10> tryton: matb roundup * #703/Invoice line: amount , taxed, total not updated after editing product: [new] Insert a product into an invoice, edit the product with another price, save it, edit it again and choose once again the product: original pr ... | ||
| 2008-12-29 04:14 -!- gremly(n=oscar@190.156.166.44) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 04:18 -!- gremly(n=oscar@190.156.166.44) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 05:19 -!- yangoon(n=mathiasb@p549F73EB.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 07:37 -!- Timitos(n=Timitos@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 08:19 -!- vengfulsquirrel(n=penny@wireless-216-170-122-150.digitalputty.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 08:40 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:21 -!- cristi_an(n=cristi@89.120.211.206) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:24 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #703/Invoice line: amount , taxed, total not updated after editing product: [resolved] I don't see any issue. The amount of the line is 6 The amount of the taxes is 0 (as there is two taxes with positive and negative value ... | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:25 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #702/domain validation on record creation should be improved: [chatting] I don't see what can be done in a general way as the domain are to complex to create a new one for the linked object. But maybe we can ... | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:27 <cristi_an> cedk: i asked you yesterday but maybe you did not see that: on my local instaltion i get a error stacktrace very very easy i just do like 6,7 clicks and so ,may i create a company on demo and play with it? | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:28 <cristi_an> maybe is my local instalataion has a problem | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:28 <cristi_an> otherwise to put those as bug if i can catch them on demo as well | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:29 <cristi_an> 6,7 clicks | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:29 <cedk> cristi_an: submit an issue in roundup | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:30 <cristi_an> hmm only if that is catched on demo as well ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:30 <cristi_an> or even if i catched it on my local server | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:30 <cristi_an> ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:30 <cristi_an> and client | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:30 <cristi_an> my local are latest sources | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:31 <cedk> cristi_an: any way | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:31 <cristi_an> oki. | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:44 <cristi_an> cedk: data that i create on demo server is not stored or you hava a script that is run and that override the data at some moment ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:45 <cedk> cristi_an: it is cleand each night | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:47 <cristi_an> i though so | ||
| 2008-12-29 09:52 -!- vengfulsquirrel_(n=penny@wireless-216-170-122-150.digitalputty.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:03 <cristi_an> the first step when tryton is started is to install the modules you need then to configure a company right ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:11 <cristi_an> you know what i will put my questions on google groups and they will be grouped on eacg moduele (so otheres can learn from it) | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:17 -!- sharkcz(n=dan@plz1-v-4-17.static.adsl.vol.cz) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:18 <cristi_an> oki ,my questions are on http://groups.google.com/group/tryton :) plz enjoy answering to them :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:25 -!- carlos(n=carlos@89.7.24.44) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:42 <CIA-10> tryton: cristi roundup * #704/company - currency issue: [new] I created a company on demo server. I choosed RO and set currency to RON. when i tried to create an invoice in financial management /invoic ... | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:46 -!- oversize(n=manuel@94.219.56.26) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 10:55 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #704/company - currency issue: [resolved] You must put the company on your user. | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:22 <udono> good morning all | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:23 <udono> cedk: did you have an opinion on topic http://groups.google.com/group/tryton/browse_thread/thread/d618d865ed3d3ddb last post? | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:27 <cedk> udono: I think that you must not add constraint on the party model | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:30 <udono> cedk: but I did not add a constraint on party model afais. | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:32 <cedk> udono: so if the default behavior is still the same, there will be no problem with the company model | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:33 <udono> cedk: yes, that's right. | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:34 <udono> cedk: what exactly I break when I recreate the party.name in another module? Is it just untested or are there side effects? | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:35 -!- mrcast(n=mrcast@host71-69-dynamic.41-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:38 <cedk> udono: I don't know, but for me the main issue is that you try t force user to respect some rules like company only one name and person two names | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:47 <udono> cedk: yes. But there are no good solutions around to realise this in an addon module. I only find the way to re define party.name with some constraints. But you told me in the past, that this is no good way because it could break things. | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:52 <cedk> udono: for me the simplest way, is just add a new fields for the first name | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:53 <cedk> udono: but as I told also previously for me I don't think it is usefull to separate the names | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:57 <cristi_an> cedk: thx for your answers on forum | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:57 <cristi_an> still have 2 quick questions: "It will validate the number. For Romania we had only two kind (10 and | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:57 <cristi_an> 13) " what is 10 ans 13 ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:58 <cristi_an> cedk:an employee is autmatically a user of the application ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:59 <cedk> cristi_an: from the doc we find, we can validate those kind of number: 1234567897 or 1630615123457 | ||
| 2008-12-29 11:59 <cedk> cristi_an: and second no | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:01 <cristi_an> cedk: what doc are you talking about ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:03 <udono> cristi_an: http://sima-pc.com/nif.php http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vat_number | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:03 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:03 <cristi_an> ohhhh | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:03 <cristi_an> this english terms | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:04 <cristi_an> i know what you mean now....:) | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:04 <cristi_an> i thougth that vat numbers are the vat tax levels validation (in ro we have 19,9,0) ....but it is the registration vat number | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:06 <udono> cedk: yes, I remember your ideas from last time. But I had some problems with the non separation of names. But anyway, I will try to solve it exactly you suggested: using the name field for the name only, adding a pre_name field for the prename and doing no special name combinations. | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:10 <cristi_an> i saw that when you create a company you specify its currency....now why i have to link the user to the company when i do an invoice in order to have the default currency as specified in company ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:11 <cristi_an> currency used for invocing does not depend on the company ...not on the user no ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:12 <cedk> cristi_an: because the company comes from the user | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:15 <cristi_an> how is that...? you may have many companies but each user has a main company and a current company | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:15 <cristi_an> what is the diff between these two | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:15 <cristi_an> ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:16 <udono> cedk: ... But then there remains another serious problem for me: I need just one on_change for the party_type for hiding first_name and gender when party_type == Organization. But an on_change_ in an addon module (Party_Types) is not callable from another addon module (Company). Both modules inherit party.party, but I can not connect from Company to the on_change of Party_types. So I needed to be depending on all other module which sh | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:18 <cedk> udono: why this is a constraint | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:18 <udono> cedk: Because I like to avoid to put a gender and a prename to a organisation party_type. | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:19 <cedk> udono: and you don't need of an on_change for that | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:21 <cristi_an> cedk: i got that part "because company comes from the user" it is like when you log in with a user and you do not log in to a company (like other applications does) | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:22 <cristi_an> cedk: but what is the diff between main company and a current company ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:22 <cristi_an> on what main company is used ? i assume current company is used...as comany that is in behalf of the user | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:23 <CIA-10> tryton: matb roundup * #703/Invoice line: amount , taxed, total not updated after editing product: [chatting] Please look close: The amount of the line should be 5, as it is on the unit price of the product and as it is shown and calculated corr ... | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:24 <udono> cedk: yeah, sorry but you are right. Actually the on change is used for name constructing and cleanup. But I don't need this any longer when just adding a prename field and don't touch the name. Yes, now I understand your idea in complete, I think. Thanks a lot!!! I try now. | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:44 -!- ikks(n=igor@190.12.153.202) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 12:50 <cristi_an> no one know what is the diff. between main company and a current company for a user? | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:06 <udono> cristi_an: I don't know. But I like to know, too. | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:06 <cristi_an> udono: thx. | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:06 <cristi_an> i am just guessing about what it is.... | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:07 <cristi_an> udono: when a company is created automatically a party is created and the party id is added a a foreign key to the company right ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:29 -!- udono(n=udono@dynamic-unidsl-85-197-24-142.westend.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:36 <cristi_an> udono: when an invoice is done and i want to print that invoice is not possible to print that invoice directly ? without open open office ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:36 <cristi_an> without that "print preview" in open office | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:39 <cristi_an> and maybe somebody knows what code and code_length is in party_party table | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:52 <udono> cristi_an: party.code is the general customer/supplier number The code lengh is used internal for showing code 1, 2, 3, 10, 20, 21, 30 in the right sort order on tree view. Not using this trick will sort the code this way: 1, 10, 2, 20, 21, 3, 30. That's because code is a char, not integer. | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:54 <cristi_an> udono: but thos code is given by user or is internally generated ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:55 <cristi_an> i see it is generated....from demo app | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:55 <cristi_an> then why is generated as char ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:55 <cristi_an> not as int | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:55 <cristi_an> and why is not the id from sequece then | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:58 <udono> cristi_an: because someone maybe wated to have d prefix or suffix like CUS001 or SUP012 | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:59 <cristi_an> udono: and that prefix where may be set ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:59 <udono> cristi_an: but it is not a strict seuence, since there is no need for strict sequence. You can shortcut (code) your party as free as possible. | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:59 <udono> s/seuence/sequence | ||
| 2008-12-29 13:59 <cristi_an> cause the code in not editable | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:00 <udono> Just write it in your code field | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:00 <cristi_an> code filed...? let me see where that is | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:00 <udono> cristi_an: ui, that's new for me, I just take a look | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:00 <udono> cristi_an: last sentences of me was wrong. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:01 <cristi_an> which one ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:01 <cristi_an> :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:01 <udono> cristi_an: code is a sequence, but not a strict one without gaping numbers. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:01 <cristi_an> i see....i am looking now where i can add prefixes | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:02 <udono> cristi_an: you can edit the sequence in Administration > Sequences > Sequences | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:02 <cristi_an> udono: yee thx | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:03 <cristi_an> since i got you :) i have 2,3 more questions...very short ones | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:03 <cristi_an> printing ....possible to be done without open "open office" | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:03 <cristi_an> direct printing....without any preview ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:04 <udono> cristi_an: yes, see at client Menu Options > File actions... | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:04 <cristi_an> pfff who learn you these...cedk ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:05 <udono> cristi_an: also see at administration > User Interface > actions > reports | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:05 <udono> cristi_an: yes, all from cedk and bechamel and long try. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:05 <cristi_an> udono: thank you | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:06 <cristi_an> i am lucky with you.... | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:06 <cristi_an> and timitos...and cedk and bechamel :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:06 <udono> cristi_an: administration > User Interface > actions > reports there is a checkbox direct print... | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:06 <cristi_an> gr8 | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:07 <cristi_an> to understand the archotecture.....there is the user ,then user has defautl company....after is logged | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:07 <udono> cristi_an: yeah, the learning curve is a bit hard, because of complexity. But tryton is much easier to understand for me then OpenERP. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:07 <cristi_an> nowafter i logge in as user x for company x | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:07 <cristi_an> for me as well | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:07 <cristi_an> so user x ,company x | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:07 <cristi_an> then i create party x | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:08 <udono> cristi_an: yes, a user has a company when the company module is installed. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:08 <cristi_an> Q: party x will be visible for comapny y and user y ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:08 -!- CIA-10(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:10 <udono> cristi_an: we have some levels of multi company. First of all: Each company has its own database. But there are exceptions: If you have dependend companies like a headquarter and some local shops, then you can create all this companys in one database. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:10 <udono> cristi_an: but this can be wrong, too, since I didn't dig deep the surface about multicompany | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:12 <cristi_an> i see....so different databases for each comapny ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:12 <cristi_an> but i may create in the same database multimple companies | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:12 <udono> cristi_an: all company things end up in database architecture. If you need at the end some reports or actions for all companys, then you need to create them in one database via company. This is because postgres doesn't handle request between different databases. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:13 <udono> cristi_an: if you need on the other end isolated companys for ASP or something, then the first step is to put them in different companys. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:14 <udono> cristi_an: because of more security and isolation of the companies access | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:14 <cristi_an> so normally one company one database... | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:14 <udono> cristi_an: yes | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:15 <cristi_an> but because of multiple connection needed for that | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:15 <cristi_an> or postgress is possible to have multimple companies in the same database ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:15 -!- mrcast(n=mrcast@host71-69-dynamic.41-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) has left #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:16 <cristi_an> ok i will try to see what happens experimenting | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:19 <udono> cristi_an: company module provides an Tryton access system only for isolating the companys. So all invoices of all companies are stored in the same table. They are isolated by a domain for the company where they are for. On the other hand Companys on different databases gives you better isolation of the companies. Tryton can not mix data from different databases. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:20 <udono> cristi_an: so when need to mix your companies, you must use Company definitions in one database. If you don't need this, choose different databases, user, logins for different companies. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:24 <cristi_an> udono: i understand mainly what you say, what i am courious i a have Company X and Company Y as child (or maybe not) a party created in company X is seen in Company Y ? (only if it is inherited) ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:24 <udono> cristi_an: just try | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:24 <cristi_an> sure... | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:25 <udono> cristi_an: and tell me the result please | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:25 <cristi_an> practice is better | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:29 <cristi_an> udono: i created in the same db another comany that do not inherit the main comany (demo) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:29 <udono> cristi_an: Its not teaching. I just don't know the answer of you question, but I like to know, too ;-) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:29 <cristi_an> The value of the field "Account Payable" on "Party" is not valid with his domain. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:29 <udono> cristi_an: ok | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:30 <cristi_an> this i get when i wnat to save a party | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:30 <udono> cristi_an: so they are separated on this? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:30 <cristi_an> have no clue | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:30 <cristi_an> i do not see any account present ... | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:31 <cristi_an> but why "The value of the field "Account Payable" on "Party" is not valid with his domain."? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:31 <udono> cristi_an: so the new company needs a new chart of account from template | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:31 <cristi_an> aha | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:31 <udono> cristi_an: and all other things like fiscalyear and accounting sequences. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:32 <udono> I guess | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:32 <cristi_an> but i can;t set this on company | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:32 <cristi_an> level | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:33 <udono> cristi_an: hm | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:33 <cristi_an> open char of account maybe | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:33 <udono> cristi_an: I have no clue | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:35 <cristi_an> i am blocked .... | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:36 <cristi_an> help needed...:) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:36 <cristi_an> but you can acces demo server with the demo client and you'll see i created a new company beside the default one | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:37 <udono> me? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:37 <udono> cristi_an: | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:37 <cristi_an> but i can;t create any party ... i just get the same message "The value of the field "Account Payable" on "Party" is not valid with his domain." | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:37 <cristi_an> udono: who want :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:37 <udono> cristi_an: just delete the entry in Account Payable | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:38 <cristi_an> udono: where ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:38 <udono> cristi_an: party | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:38 <cristi_an> it is empty | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:38 <udono> cristi_an: hm | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:39 <udono> cristi_an: its maybe a bug | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:39 -!- ikks_(n=igor@201.244.188.98) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:40 <cristi_an> everything may be more clear if i can find out what is shared between companies that are created in the same db | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:41 <cristi_an> and if a company that has a parent what things inherits from that ? (party ,products) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:42 <udono> cristi_an: I would start with single company to understand Tryton. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:43 <cristi_an> anyway is not even possible to create a company that has a parent | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:43 <cristi_an> try on demo and you will see | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:43 <cristi_an> "The field "Account Payable" on "Party" is required." | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:43 <udono> cristi_an: so the level of nested companies is one? | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:44 <cristi_an> 1 | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:44 <cristi_an> i tried to create a company that has as parent the default demo company b2ck | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:45 <udono> cristi_an: I would file an issue. Just write down what you do, what happens in real and what you expect to see. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:45 <cristi_an> is not that important yet :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:45 <cristi_an> as you said better to understant the one company | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:45 <udono> cristi_an: it could be a bug... so when you are interested in, file an issue. | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:46 <cristi_an> oki i file it now | ||
| 2008-12-29 14:48 <CIA-10> tryton: cristi roundup * #705/create nested company: [new] I tried to create on demo server a company that has as parent the b2ck demo company unfortunatelly i can't do that since i get this messa ... | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:24 <cristi_an> i update my database but i got this | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:24 <cristi_an> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/97171/ | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:24 <cristi_an> is this a bad thing look at ERROR | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:24 <cristi_an> plz | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:37 <cristi_an> this is what i get error when updateding | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:37 <cristi_an> [Mon Dec 29 16:28:24 2008] ERROR:init:module:osv:Module not found! | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:37 <cristi_an> [Mon Dec 29 16:28:24 2008] ERROR:init:module:vatnumber:Module not found! | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:37 <cristi_an> [Mon Dec 29 16:28:24 2008] ERROR:init:module:.metadata:Module not found! | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:38 <cristi_an> oh these are some directories...i created..:) | ||
| 2008-12-29 15:39 <cristi_an> and eclipse. | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:05 <Timitos> cristi_an: the .metadata error is normal as you eclipse. and are the other ones from you? | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:11 <cristi_an> yee finally i figured that out | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:11 <cristi_an> :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:11 <cristi_an> thx | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:16 <cristi_an> an employee is a party as well | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:16 <cristi_an> ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:17 <cristi_an> one2one relation | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:17 <cristi_an> ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:18 <cristi_an> so when i create an emplyee that i "attach" to a company in the db a party is created then a company_empoyee | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:18 <cristi_an> can someone confirm this ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:26 <Timitos> cristi_an: confirmed. but why do you ask that? you can verify this in the postgres db | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:28 <cristi_an> since i find odd what i saw...why an employee is a party ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:29 <cristi_an> i am sure that there is a reason for this but i do not see it now | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:32 <cristi_an> and there is something more...there is a res_user table | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:32 <cristi_an> which is a base table | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:32 <cristi_an> part from framework | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:33 <cristi_an> but there employee is added later i guess after adding the module company | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:35 <cristi_an> cedk:(or anyone) having the base tables (framework ones) is ok to update those when new modules are added ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:35 <Timitos> cristi_an: you can relate employees and users from this view: -> administration -> users -> users | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:36 <cristi_an> i know...that...but this is done adding a filed employee to the res_user table | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:36 <cristi_an> which is a "base table" (system one) | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:36 <cristi_an> i am courious why this field was not in oposite direction created | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:37 <cristi_an> i mean an employee to have the user id | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:38 <Timitos> hm. i don´t know. | ||
| 2008-12-29 16:38 <cristi_an> maybe is ok...but i considered the base tables untouchable... | ||
| 2008-12-29 18:19 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-223-74-196.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 18:33 -!- sharkcz(n=dan@plz1-v-4-17.static.adsl.vol.cz) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:00 -!- cristi_an(n=cristi@89.120.211.206) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:09 <cristi_an> where the employee field is added to the res_usr table ? somewhere in the model ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:10 <cristi_an> when installing company module i assume,but where in the code is this specified ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:15 <udono> cristi_an: see company module and grep for "class Employee" | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:17 <cristi_an> i have eclipse so i searched for that...Employee class...but there i do not find a link between res_usr(or usr_res) table and employee | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:17 <cristi_an> in that class there is nothing mentioning relation with user table | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:17 -!- snowch(n=snowch@82.152.13.57) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:17 <cristi_an> hi snowch | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:18 <snowch> hi cristi_an | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:18 <udono> cristi_an: so they are not linked?! | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:19 <udono> cristi_an: I found them in res/user.py | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:19 <cristi_an> udono: really ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:20 <snowch> cristi_an: how is your progress with tryton? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:20 <cristi_an> well i am trying hard :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:20 <cristi_an> i guess guys from here had enough of me :) but ...this is | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:21 <cristi_an> udono: i found this as well | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:21 <udono> cristi_an: the definition is in company/company.py see class User and class Employee | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:22 <cristi_an> udono: yes thx...i am looking on that. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:23 <cristi_an> udono: i did not expect to find it there :) since user class i thought is defined in the framework or in a default installed module | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:23 <cristi_an> but here there are only added some extra fileds to it | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:23 <snowch> cristi_an: i've decided to work on reimplementing small parts of tryton/tiny first. I have got the tiny client connecting to a java service using netrpc. I am now working on db create/delete/list/list_lang. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:23 <udono> cristi_an: yes, you are right, user class is defined in res/users.py | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:24 <udono> cristi_an: but company inherits res.user | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:24 <udono> cristi_an: and puts some employee stuff to the orig. class | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:24 <cristi_an> and company as well | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:25 <snowch> cristi_an: i have extracted parts from netsvc, tinyserver and tiny_socket and using jython, pass the method call to a spring service... | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:25 <cristi_an> snowch: nice stuff | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:25 <cristi_an> but i read on forum you had some problems because is not standar rpc xml ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:26 <cristi_an> udono: where is specified that the company inherits res.user | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:26 <cristi_an> ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:26 <udono> class User(OSV): | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:26 <udono> _name = 'res.user' | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:26 <snowch> cristi_an: yes, the client only uses netrpc so I decided to use that instead of xmlrpc. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:27 <udono> if res.user already exist, then it is inheritance | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:27 <cristi_an> udono: i see | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:28 <snowch> cristi_an: it's been nice breaking the application apart into self contained modules. it helps to unwind all the dependencies. python code with lots of classes per file means lots of imports, even though each class may have only a few imports. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:28 <udono> we have the convention for tryton inheritance to name the class the same then the original class (class User(OSV)) but this is convention, not restriction. But the _name attribute makes the Tryton inheritance | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:29 <cristi_an> udono: i understand | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:29 <cristi_an> snowch: yes coming from java i understand your point | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:30 <udono> snowch: do you rebuild the trytond in java? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:30 <cristi_an> my first goal is finally to understand the application and to know each (but i mean each detail) from company party module | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:31 <cristi_an> how is built ,how it works ,how can be extended, everything :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:31 <cristi_an> udono: i would like to do that :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:31 <snowch> udono: i've slimmed down netsvc.py, tinyserver.py and tinysocket.py. I then use jython to extract the service and method (e.g. db / list) and pass it to a spring java service. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:31 <udono> cristi_an: company module is hard to understand. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:32 <cristi_an> udono: but is is the basic not ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:32 <udono> snowch: just for fun or real use? | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:32 <udono> cristi_an: party is easy for starting, company is harder (for me) | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:33 <cristi_an> well when i meant company i meant company + party :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:33 <cristi_an> all that is installed with party module :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:33 <snowch> udono: eventually for real use. I started trying to understand in detail the tryton/tiny code base but found it to be to difficult to work out because the code is tightly coupled. I'm now approaching it from a different angle of taking it apart piece by piece. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:34 <udono> snowch: hard work. But good luck! | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:35 <snowch> udono: thanks! | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:35 <udono> cristi_an: party is a dependencie of company but not vice versa. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:37 <cristi_an> udono: well i consider them one part :) since comany can't be installed as single entity (maybe i am wrong) | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:37 <cristi_an> so i installed pary so i have tehm all | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:37 <cristi_an> s/pary/party | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:41 <udono> cristi_an: no, when you install party, then you have only party. But when installing company, then you have party too. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:43 <udono> cristi_an: sorry party needs country too, but not company. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:43 <cristi_an> udono: that's right. | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:43 <cristi_an> i was wrong about that | ||
| 2008-12-29 19:44 <cristi_an> i forgot how i did it | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:02 <cristi_an> guys do you know a tool that can build the ER diagram out of a postgress schema ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <ikks> postgresql_autodoc | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <ikks> cristi_an | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <cristi_an> yes | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <cristi_an> this is a command ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <ikks> apt-get install | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <cristi_an> aha.... | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <ikks> the blessing of having Debian | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <cristi_an> i really love ubuntu.... | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <ikks> I mean a descendant of it... | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:04 <cristi_an> just apt get..... | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:05 <cristi_an> and ...bummmm you got it | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:05 <cristi_an> i am not used to this kind of goodies :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:06 <cristi_an> sh...t :) "Building dependency tree | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:06 <cristi_an> Reading state information... Done | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:06 <cristi_an> E: Couldn't find package postgresql_autodoc | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:06 <cristi_an> " | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:07 <carlos> carlos@aragorn:~$ apt-cache search postgresql autodoc | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:07 <carlos> postgresql-autodoc - Utility to create a PostgreSQL database schema overview in HTML, DOT and XML | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:09 <cristi_an> this is same at me to :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:09 <cristi_an> what do i have to do next ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:09 <cristi_an> carlos: | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:11 <carlos> cristi_an: apt-get install postgresql-autodoc | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:11 <carlos> you used '_' instead of '-' | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:12 <cristi_an> yep...:) | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:12 <cristi_an> thx a lot carlos | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:12 <carlos> np | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:14 <cristi_an> carlos: where can i found where it was installed in order to run it | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:14 <carlos> dpkg -L postgresql-autodoc will tell you all files installed by that package | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:16 <cristi_an> gr8 | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:25 -!- evernichon(n=evernich@AToulouse-256-1-62-68.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:26 <cristi_an> what is the sequence from address class (table as well)? | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:46 <cristi_an> and also i saw sequence in party_contacts_mechanism | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:46 <cristi_an> what is that used for ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:47 <cristi_an> sequence = fields.Integer("Sequence") | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:47 <cristi_an> i can't see as being a field that can be edited | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:48 <cedk> cristi_an: it is for sorting | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:49 <cristi_an> is described on wiki ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:49 <cristi_an> if not can you tell me in a few words how is used for sorting plz | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:51 <cedk> cristi_an: see _order in http://www.tryton.org/doc/branches/1.0/trytond/doc/models.html | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:53 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 215:dc0df312ddfa website/ (19 files in 4 dirs): Add translation mecanism and add fr_FR translation | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:53 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 216:12207fe37ad8 website/: merge | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:54 <cristi_an> cedk: i read that before as well but how is that realted to sequence | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:54 <cristi_an> cedk: "# _order: A tuple defining how the row are sorted when the underlying table is read. E.g.: [('name', 'ASC'), 'age', 'DESC']" | ||
| 2008-12-29 20:57 <cedk> cristi_an: so we put sequence on _order | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:00 <cristi_an> cedk: i see where self._order.insert(1, ('sequence', 'ASC')) | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:00 <cristi_an> cedk: but i have to find out what this means :) | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:00 <cristi_an> cedk: and how this sequence may be used ,created...etc etc | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:00 <cedk> cristi_an: that means order on sequence | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:01 <cristi_an> cedk: but sequence is 0 ,0,0 | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:01 <cristi_an> at least in my db | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:01 <cedk> cristi_an: but you can change it to set an order | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:02 <cristi_an> cedk: nice then ...is that hard to do ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:02 <cedk> cristi_an: what? | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:03 <cristi_an> to set an order and change the 0,0,0 | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:03 <cristi_an> cedk: | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:03 <cedk> cristi_an: just Drag and drop | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:04 <cristi_an> cedk: you are talking about the columns ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:04 <cristi_an> w8 | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:04 <cristi_an> let me look in the client | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:06 <cristi_an> i moved skype.addres and what i defined with drag and drop | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:06 <cristi_an> and ineed sequence appeared but not incremental | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:06 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 217:08ce7344fb9f website/lightbox.js: Fix image url in lightbox | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:07 <cristi_an> it is like 7,2,6 | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:07 <cristi_an> i got it now | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:07 <cristi_an> skpe has 7 | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:07 <cristi_an> in combobox | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:08 <cristi_an> i was wrong:) | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:08 <cristi_an> now i have like 8,7,6 | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:09 <cristi_an> cedk: how is that sequence built when moving items with drag and drop ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:10 <cristi_an> from what i see experimenting a new sequence is built each time | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:10 <cristi_an> i do an update | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:11 <cedk> cristi_an: yes | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:11 <cristi_an> and sorting then is based on tht sequence | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:11 <cristi_an> that is why on that table table headers do not react to clicks | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:11 <cristi_an> different kind of sorting | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:17 <cristi_an> cedk: last thing today "self._order.insert(0, ('party', 'ASC')) | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:17 <cristi_an> self._order.insert(1, ('sequence', 'ASC'))" | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:17 <cristi_an> what means this sorting fisrt after party then after | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:17 <cristi_an> sequence ? | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:24 <cristi_an> cedk: is that a must because i as relation one2many so why to order a list after party if all the items has the same party. | ||
| 2008-12-29 21:32 -!- udono(n=udono@dynamic-unidsl-85-197-24-142.westend.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- ChanServ(ChanServ@services.) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- snowch(n=snowch@82.152.13.57) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- CIA-10(n=CIA@208.69.182.149) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- carlos(n=carlos@89.7.24.44) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- Timitos(n=Timitos@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- yangoon(n=mathiasb@p549F73EB.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:48 -!- panthera(n=daniel@unable-to-package.org) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:49 -!- bechamel(n=user@85.201.86.139) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 22:49 -!- saxa(i=1000@host242-95-static.223-217-b.business.telecomitalia.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 23:41 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <bch@b2ck.com> default * 218:aa361f3faf7c website/ (4 files in 2 dirs): French translation reviewed | ||
| 2008-12-29 23:42 -!- ikks(n=igor@201.244.188.98) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 23:45 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <bch@b2ck.com> default * 219:ae9ada32382b website/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/ (tryton.mo tryton.po): Better naming | ||
| 2008-12-29 23:49 -!- ikks(n=igor@201.244.188.98) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2008-12-29 23:52 -!- vengfulsquirrel(n=penny@wireless-216-170-122-150.digitalputty.com) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!